Questions tagged [abstract-algebra]

For questions about monoids, groups, rings, modules, fields, vector spaces, algebras over fields, various types of lattices, and other such algebraic objects. Associate with related tags like [group-theory], [ring-theory], [modules], etc. as necessary to clarify which topic of abstract algebra is most related to your question and help other users when searching.

Abstract algebra is the study of algebraic objects, i.e. sets endowed with one or more operations on the elements of those sets. In particular, the study of abstract algebra considers the algebraic structures and properties of which such operations induce. It can be considered as the generalization of the study of the algebraic structure of the integers and real numbers (arithmetic), or the study of matrices and vector spaces (linear algebra).

Some algebraic objects are monoids, groups, rings, fields, vector spaces, modules, algebras, and categories, among many other less prominent objects.

Examples

  1. The set of non-negative integers $\mathbb{N} = \{0,1,2,3,\dotsc\}$ is a monoid under the operation $+$.

  2. The integers $\mathbb{Z} = \{\dotsc,-1,0,1,\dotsc\}$ under the binary operation of $+$ form a group.

  3. Furthermore, $\mathbb{Z}$ has the structure of a ring when you consider it as being equipped with both addition and multiplication.

  4. The real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ with their usual addition and multiplication form a field.

  5. The set of $n\times n$ matrices with entries in $\mathbb{R}$ with matrix addition and multiplication form a ring.

  6. The set of $1\times n$ vectors over the real numbers, with vector addition, and multiplication by elements of the $n\times n$ real matrices on the right are an example of a module for the ring of matrices.

In addition to studying the objects themselves, abstract algebra considers homomorphisms between the objects and various constructions and tools, which are useful for studying the objects.

85022 questions
4
votes
2 answers

Notation Abstract Algebra

On page 236 of Falko Lorenz's "Algebra Volume 1: Fields and Galois Theory", exercise 4.2(c), the author asks $\\$ Let $R$ be a unique factorization domain. If $P$ is a directory of primes of $R$ and $K =$ Frac $R$, the multiplicative group of K…
Chris
  • 421
4
votes
2 answers

Quaternion algebras over finite fields up to isomorphism

I'm trying to prove that all quaternion algebras over $\mathbb{F}_p$, for $p$ an odd prime, are isomorphic to $M_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$. When $p = 1 \pmod 4$, $-1$ is a square in the field and we can construct an obvious sort of "basis" of matrices for…
4
votes
2 answers

Prime ideals in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$

Am I right that all prime ideals in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ has the form $p\mathbb{Z}[x]$ for some prime $p\in\mathbb{Z}$? Thanks a lot!
Aspirin
  • 5,659
4
votes
2 answers

Splitting Field of a family of polynomials

When one says that $K$ is a splitting field of a family of polynomials over $F$ is it assumed that the family of polynomials is always finite? If infinite families are allowed then I wonder if the splitting field would be algebraic?
Mykie
  • 7,037
4
votes
3 answers

How many ring can $(\mathbb{Z},+)$ upgrade to? (Can we define $(-1)\times(-1)=-1$?)

We know that $(\mathbb{Z},+)$ is an abelian group. And under usual multiplication, $(\mathbb{Z},+,\times)$ become a ring. Is there another binary operation $\square$ on $\mathbb{Z}$ that can make $(\mathbb{Z},+,\square)$ to be a ring? PS: The…
Eric
  • 4,517
  • 1
  • 18
  • 36
4
votes
1 answer

Monomorphism and epimorphisms definitions in Lang's Algebra

I am currently going through Lang's Algebra, and I've come across a definition that a friend had warned me I would eventually encounter and said that Lang had defined incorrectly. He then cited the 'Terminology' section of this page:…
abstract
  • 356
4
votes
3 answers

In a ring that is the direct product of two fields, why isn't it a field?

Suppose that we have the direct product of two fields, defined as: $\mathbb{F}^2 = \mathbb{F} \ \times\ \mathbb{F}$. Then, this is obviously not a field because we can take $(1,0)$, and this doesn't have a multiplicative inverse. However, I saw a…
user321627
  • 2,584
4
votes
5 answers

Why is a reflection followed by another reflection is a rotation?

I just started abstract algebra and we are working with dihedral groups. I've made Cayley tables for D3 and D4 but I can't explain why two reflections are the same as a rotation
Maria
  • 183
4
votes
1 answer

$\mathbb{Q}$ closed in the adeles?

It is relatively easy to see that $\mathbb{Q}$ (diagonally embedded) is dense in $\mathbb{A}_\mathrm{fin} = \hat{\prod}^{Z_p} Q_p$ (the 'finite adeles where the restricted product is only taken for the finite places $p$) so it cannot be a closed…
4
votes
1 answer

fundamental of abstract algebra help

Let $a,\,b,\,c$ be elements of some group with $abc=e$. Does it follow that $bca=e$? And does it follow that $bac=e$? Give proof or counterexample. If $abc=e$ then $bc= a^{-1}$ then it follows that $bca= (a^{-1})a=e$. But how about $bac=e$? Can…
Johnny
  • 41
4
votes
1 answer

What are the implications of a (group, set, monoid) having an identity operation?

Across many of the algebras, including those of sets, groups, categories etc., it's often noted that the presence of an identity operation (or lack thereof) is a major trait in distinguishing between various abstractions; e.g. a monoid is distinct…
Jules
  • 447
4
votes
3 answers

Let $G$ be a finite group and let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Prove $|gH| \in G/H$ divides $|g|\in G$.

Let $G$ be a finite group and let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Prove that the order of the element $gH$ in $G/H$ must divide the order of $g$ in $G$. I see that if we have: $H = \{e, h_1, ..., h_2\}, gH = \{g, gh_1, ..., gh_2\}, ..., g^{k-1}H =…
Oliver G
  • 4,792
4
votes
2 answers

Abelian quotient group

I'm stuck on the following practice problem. Any hints would be appreciated. Suppose $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ such that every subgroup of $N$ is normal in $G$ and $C_{G}(N) \subset N$. Prove that $G/N$ is abelian. I'm not sure how to use…
Mykie
  • 7,037
4
votes
0 answers

Prove that $|\operatorname{Inn}(G)| = 1 \Rightarrow G$ is Abelian.

Prove that $|\operatorname{Inn}(G)| = 1 \Rightarrow G$ is Abelian. Since $|\operatorname{Inn}(G)| = |\{\phi_e, \phi_{a_1}, \phi_{a_2},\ldots:$ such that $a_i \in G$, and $\phi_i(x)$ is an inner automorphism$\}| = 1$ $\Rightarrow…
Oliver G
  • 4,792
4
votes
4 answers

$\mathbb{Z}$ has no torsion?

What does is mean to say that $\mathbb{Z}$ has no torsion? This is an important fact for any course? Thanks, I heard that in my field theory course, but I don't know what it is.