Questions tagged [dynamical-systems]

In dynamical systems, the motion of a particle in some geometric space, governed by some time dependent rules, is studied. The process can be discrete (where the particle jumps from point to point) or continuous (where the particle follows a trajectory). Dynamical systems is used in mathematical models of diverse fields such as classical mechanics, economics, traffic modelling, population dynamics, and biological feedback.

A dynamical system is, very broadly, a system which changes in time according to some rules. One concrete example of a dynamical system is the following.

Example 1: A billiard ball moving on a frictionless billiards table. In this example, what is changing in time is the position of the ball. There are two rules governing this motion, namely that the ball will travel at the same speed for all time, and that the ball will bank off a rail at the same angle that it hit the rail.

Given an initial position and velocity for the ball, these two rules enable one to compute the trajectory of the ball for all time. This illustrates an important property of dynamical systems: they are deterministic. The rules governing the dynamical system should, at least in theory, allow one to determine the state of the system at every point in the future, given some initial data. Another, more abstract, example of a dynamical system is

Example 2: A function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this example, one thinks of $X$ as a space in which a particle is moving, and $f$ as a rule governing the motion of the particle. Explicitly, if the particle is at the point $x_0\in X$ at time $t = 0$, then at time $t = 1$ it is at the point $x_1:= f(x_0)$, and at time $t = 2$ it is at the point $x_2 := f(x_1)$, etc.

Given the initial position $x_0$ of the particle, its position at time $t = n$ is therefore $f^{\circ n}(x_0)$, where $f^{\circ n}$ denotes the composition of $f$ with itself $n$ times. In this example, studying the dynamical system is equivalent to studying the iterates of $f$

Notice that in example 1 the position of the ball is defined for every time $t>0$, whereas in example 2 the position of the particle is only defined at positive integer values of time. Example 1 is called a continuous time dynamical system, and example 2 is called a discrete time dynamical system. These are the most commonly studied dynamical systems.

In both continuous and discrete time dynamical systems, the most commonly asked questions are the following:

  1. What is the trajectory of the system given specified initial conditions? While these trajectories can be computed in theory, in practice they are often difficult to impossible to compute.
  2. What is the long term behavior of the system? What happens after a long time, i.e., as $t\to\infty$?
  3. Are there any initial conditions which lead to "special" trajectories? For instance, in example 1, if the ball is hit from the center of the table along a line perpendicular to a rail, then its trajectory will be periodic, that is, it will repeat itself forever.

Continuous time dynamical systems

The most classical examples of dynamical systems are continuous time dynamical systems coming from physics. The motion of a particle moving in space under some force is a standard system; the rules governing the system in this situation are Newton's laws of motion. Another common systems are the diffusion of heat through a material, which is determined by the heat equation, or the motion of particles in a fluid, which is determined by a flow.

In each of these, as in most continuous time dynamical systems, the rules governing the system are a system of differential equations. Because of this, there is a great deal of overlap between the study dynamical systems and differential equations. Questions about the asymptotic behavior of solutions of differential equations very often fall under the heading of dynamical systems.

Discrete time dynamical systems

A discrete time dynamical system is given by a function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this generality, such a system is hard to study. Usually one imposes more structure:

  • If $X$ is a topological space and $f$ is continuous, it is called a topological dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a manifold and $f$ is smooth, is it called a smooth dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a complex manifold and $f$ is holomorphic, it is called a complex dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a measure space and $f$ is measurable, it is called a measurable dynamical system.

Each of these types of dynamical systems has a rich theory behind it.

Chaos and ergodic theory

The most interesting dynamical systems are those that exhibit chaotic behavior. For instance, in example 1, suppose one hits the ball from the center of the table in a certain direction, and on another table one hits the ball from the center of the table in a slightly different direction. Then, after a long period of time, the trajectories of the two balls will diverge and be very different. Thus a slight change in initial conditions (direction the ball is hit) results in very different behavior of the two systems. Such extreme sensitivity to initial conditions is referred to as chaotic behavior.

Systems which exhibit chaotic behavior, while interesting, are often more difficult to study. A common method for approaching such systems is to use statistical and probabilistic methods. In example 1, for instance, instead of asking where the ball is at some very large time $t$ (which could be difficult to compute), one could ask where the ball is most likely to be at time $t$. Such questions are usually easier to approach, and fall under the heading of ergodic theory.

7122 questions
1
vote
2 answers

Show that f: $\mathbb{R}$/$\mathbb{Z}$ $\to$ $\mathbb{R}$/$\mathbb{Z}$ orientation reversing. Then f(x) = x has exactly 2 solutions.

Im having some problem with the following question. Show that if $f: \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$ orientation reversing, then $f(x) = x$ has exactly $2$ solutions. ($f$ has $2$ fixed points) I was wondering if anyone can help.
1
vote
1 answer

Does every matrix have periodic orbits of even length?

Let $A$ be an $n \times n$ matrix (let's say hyperbolic, but this might be irrelevant). Consider the action of $A$ on $(\mathbb{R} \backslash \mathbb{Z})^n$. Does this action always have periodic orbits with minimal period being an even number…
mkk
  • 388
1
vote
3 answers

The general solution of $y(n+1) = ay(n)^2$

I would like to find the general solution of the difference equation $y(n+1) = \alpha y(n)^2 $. I know that the general solution to $y(n+1) = y(n)^2$ is $y(n) = \exp({c\cdot 2^{n}})$. However, I've not yet been able to rewrite it to a general…
1
vote
0 answers

Are preperiodic points subgroup?

Suppose that $G$ is a group and $f$ a group endomomorphism of $G$. Let $H = \{g \in G \mid f^n(g) = f^m(g) \textrm{ for some positive integers } n,m \textrm{ with } n \neq m\}$ be the set of preperiodic points of $f$. Is $H$ a subgroup of $G$? I…
Mmhmm
  • 231
1
vote
1 answer

Sarkovskii ordering is not a well-ordering?

The Wikipedia article on Sarkovskii's theorem claims that the Sarkovskii ordering of the natural numbers is not a well-ordering, stating: Note that this ordering is not a well-ordering, since the set $$\left\{ 2^k \mid k \in \mathbb{N}…
Andrea
  • 1,909
  • 3
  • 18
  • 31
1
vote
0 answers

No periodic solution using Bendixson's criterion and Global analysis.

Theorem: Let $Z:U\subset \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$ a $\mathcal{C}^1$ field defined in a simply connected set $U$. If $\mathrm{div} Z(x)\neq0$ for all $x\in U$, then $Z$ does not have any periodic orbit entirely contained in…
peter
  • 165
1
vote
1 answer

Show there is only one trajectory passing through each point

I have to show the following: Let $\varphi$ be a flow on the manifold M and suppose that that the orbits {$\varphi_t (x_0)$} & {$\varphi_t (x_1)$} intersect. Prove that the orbits coincide.
NRL
  • 13
1
vote
1 answer

Dynamical Systems Periodic Orbits existing

Consider the nonlinear dynamical system $(1)$ : $x' = y(1 + x−y^2)$, $y' = x(1 + y−x^2)$, where $(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^2$. (i) Determine the equilibrium points of $(1)$ (ii) Classify the equilibrium points found in part (i) (iii) Suppose that the…
snowman
  • 3,733
  • 8
  • 42
  • 73
0
votes
1 answer

How I can find a similar expression for $x₀>1/2$

For the logistic map http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogisticMapR=2.html the formula (4) in the link is valid only for $x₀<1/2$. How I can find a similar expression for $x₀>1/2$. The same question for $r=-2$ (defined only in an interval of lenght…
DER
  • 3,011
0
votes
1 answer

About quadratic map

let us consider the following quadratic map: $$s_{n}=s_{n-1}²+c$$ $$(*)$$ There is several papers disscuting the dynamics of (*). I want to know the behavior of this map for $c=-2$ and I am asking if this map is equivalent to the logistic map…
DER
  • 3,011
0
votes
1 answer

Difference between slow and inertial manifolds?

Could anyone provide a clear definition of the basic difference between two of the invariant manifold types - the inertial and slow manifolds?
0
votes
1 answer

periodicity of an interval exchange transformation(IET)

Let $T$ be an IET. That is, $T:[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$ is a piecewise orientation-preserving isometry. Let $D$ be the set of points whose entire forward iterates are well-defined. I have the following questions: (1) If for every $x \in D$ there…
a12345
  • 1,323
0
votes
1 answer

A (topological) transitive point must be a recurrent point?

Given a continuous map $f:X\to X$ (maybe $X$ is a metric space, even $X$ is a compact metric space), the point $x$ is a transitive point, if $x$'s orbit is dense in $X$. And $x$ is a recurrent point if there exists a subsequence of $x$'s orbit such…
David Chan
  • 1,960
0
votes
1 answer

Show a continuous bijection cannot have periodic points of prime period greater than 2

Suppose f:R↦R is a continuous bijection. Show that the system x_n+1=f(xn) cannot have periodic points of prime period greater than 2. Hint: Use Sharkovskii's Theorem to reduce the problem to the case of periodic points of prime period 4, then use…
0
votes
1 answer

Stable (resp. Unstable) sets / subspaces of dynamical systems.

I read the book of Yuri. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. He claims, $W^s(x_0) = \{x : \phi^t x\rightarrow x_0, t \rightarrow \infty\}$, defined therein as a stable set, same (as much as I get) as Stable subspace as in Hirsch and…
Sean
  • 145