Questions tagged [dynamical-systems]

In dynamical systems, the motion of a particle in some geometric space, governed by some time dependent rules, is studied. The process can be discrete (where the particle jumps from point to point) or continuous (where the particle follows a trajectory). Dynamical systems is used in mathematical models of diverse fields such as classical mechanics, economics, traffic modelling, population dynamics, and biological feedback.

A dynamical system is, very broadly, a system which changes in time according to some rules. One concrete example of a dynamical system is the following.

Example 1: A billiard ball moving on a frictionless billiards table. In this example, what is changing in time is the position of the ball. There are two rules governing this motion, namely that the ball will travel at the same speed for all time, and that the ball will bank off a rail at the same angle that it hit the rail.

Given an initial position and velocity for the ball, these two rules enable one to compute the trajectory of the ball for all time. This illustrates an important property of dynamical systems: they are deterministic. The rules governing the dynamical system should, at least in theory, allow one to determine the state of the system at every point in the future, given some initial data. Another, more abstract, example of a dynamical system is

Example 2: A function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this example, one thinks of $X$ as a space in which a particle is moving, and $f$ as a rule governing the motion of the particle. Explicitly, if the particle is at the point $x_0\in X$ at time $t = 0$, then at time $t = 1$ it is at the point $x_1:= f(x_0)$, and at time $t = 2$ it is at the point $x_2 := f(x_1)$, etc.

Given the initial position $x_0$ of the particle, its position at time $t = n$ is therefore $f^{\circ n}(x_0)$, where $f^{\circ n}$ denotes the composition of $f$ with itself $n$ times. In this example, studying the dynamical system is equivalent to studying the iterates of $f$

Notice that in example 1 the position of the ball is defined for every time $t>0$, whereas in example 2 the position of the particle is only defined at positive integer values of time. Example 1 is called a continuous time dynamical system, and example 2 is called a discrete time dynamical system. These are the most commonly studied dynamical systems.

In both continuous and discrete time dynamical systems, the most commonly asked questions are the following:

  1. What is the trajectory of the system given specified initial conditions? While these trajectories can be computed in theory, in practice they are often difficult to impossible to compute.
  2. What is the long term behavior of the system? What happens after a long time, i.e., as $t\to\infty$?
  3. Are there any initial conditions which lead to "special" trajectories? For instance, in example 1, if the ball is hit from the center of the table along a line perpendicular to a rail, then its trajectory will be periodic, that is, it will repeat itself forever.

Continuous time dynamical systems

The most classical examples of dynamical systems are continuous time dynamical systems coming from physics. The motion of a particle moving in space under some force is a standard system; the rules governing the system in this situation are Newton's laws of motion. Another common systems are the diffusion of heat through a material, which is determined by the heat equation, or the motion of particles in a fluid, which is determined by a flow.

In each of these, as in most continuous time dynamical systems, the rules governing the system are a system of differential equations. Because of this, there is a great deal of overlap between the study dynamical systems and differential equations. Questions about the asymptotic behavior of solutions of differential equations very often fall under the heading of dynamical systems.

Discrete time dynamical systems

A discrete time dynamical system is given by a function $f\colon X\to X$, where $X$ is a set. In this generality, such a system is hard to study. Usually one imposes more structure:

  • If $X$ is a topological space and $f$ is continuous, it is called a topological dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a manifold and $f$ is smooth, is it called a smooth dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a complex manifold and $f$ is holomorphic, it is called a complex dynamical system.
  • If $X$ is a measure space and $f$ is measurable, it is called a measurable dynamical system.

Each of these types of dynamical systems has a rich theory behind it.

Chaos and ergodic theory

The most interesting dynamical systems are those that exhibit chaotic behavior. For instance, in example 1, suppose one hits the ball from the center of the table in a certain direction, and on another table one hits the ball from the center of the table in a slightly different direction. Then, after a long period of time, the trajectories of the two balls will diverge and be very different. Thus a slight change in initial conditions (direction the ball is hit) results in very different behavior of the two systems. Such extreme sensitivity to initial conditions is referred to as chaotic behavior.

Systems which exhibit chaotic behavior, while interesting, are often more difficult to study. A common method for approaching such systems is to use statistical and probabilistic methods. In example 1, for instance, instead of asking where the ball is at some very large time $t$ (which could be difficult to compute), one could ask where the ball is most likely to be at time $t$. Such questions are usually easier to approach, and fall under the heading of ergodic theory.

7122 questions
3
votes
1 answer

Shadowing lemma

I am trying to find a resource with a proof of the shadowing lemma (for maps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowing_lemma) that is not too general. Ideally, a planar (or in $\mathbb{R}^n$) non-linear discrete dynamical system around a hyperbolic…
xyz
  • 960
3
votes
0 answers

Finding a trapping region for the Hénon map

In his famous paper A two-dimensional mapping with strange attractor, Hénon gives an explicit trapping region for the Hénon map with $a=1.3$ and $b=0.4$. In the figure below, the quadrilateral $Q=ABCD$ is mapped to the curvilinear quadrilateral…
lhf
  • 216,483
3
votes
2 answers

How to construct a function which has 5-period point and has no 3-period point

I just learnt Sarkoveskii theorem. I try to construct a continuous function $f:[0,1]\to [0,1]$ which has 5-period point but has no 3-period point. But I have no idea how to construct a such function.
Y.Wayne
  • 309
  • 1
  • 10
3
votes
0 answers

A question about finite number of orbits $f:X\to X$.

Recently, I read a paper entitled "Hyper-expansive homeomorphisms". Definition: A homeomorphism $f:X\to X$ is hyper-expansive if there is a $c>0$ such that for every closed sets $A\neq B$, there is $n\in \mathbb{Z}$ with $d_H(f^n(A), f^n(B))>c$,…
user479859
  • 1,287
3
votes
0 answers

Nonlinear dynamical system with non isolated critical points

I am currently working on the system: \begin{align} \dot x = y, \ \ \dot y = -x-yz, \ \ \dot z = -xz + 7x^2 \end{align} The critical points of this system are the whole of z-axis and that can be easily calculated. The positive part of z-axis is…
3
votes
1 answer

Convergence to the non-wandering set (for a compact dynamical system)

Let $X$ be a compact metric space and let $T\colon X \to X$ be continuous and injective. A point $x$ is said to be wandering if there exists an open neighborhood $V \ni x$ and a time $N \in \mathbb{N}^*$ such that, for all $n \geq N$, $$ T^n(V) \cap…
Cryme
  • 514
3
votes
1 answer

Proving continuous dependence on initial conditions for flows

I'm looking for assistance in solving a dynamical systems problem. Considering the flow $\phi (t;x): \mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$, that isn't necessarily associated to an ODE, for which I need to prove continuous…
Azog4
  • 53
3
votes
0 answers

Toral automorphism / Arnold's cat map

I am new to Dynamical Systems and recently I found the book of Brin and Stuck and decided to begin with this. I have a problem to understand one example it mentions about hyperbolic toral automorphisms. To begin with, first we take the matrix $ A= …
3
votes
0 answers

Circle rotations are conjugate by a homeomorphism iff $\alpha = \pm \beta$ mod 1

Let $R_\alpha(s)=s+\alpha $ mod 1, likewise for $R_\beta$ be the circle rotations on the unit interval. Prove that $R_\alpha$ and $R_\beta$ are conjugate by a homeomorphism iff $\alpha = \pm \beta$ mod 1. From Brin & Stuck: Introduction to…
Bo5man
  • 116
3
votes
1 answer

Nonwandering set (equivalent definitions)

Katok, Hasselblatt: "Modern theory of dynamical systems", p. 129: Definition 3.3.3. A point $x\in X$ is nonwandering with respect to the map $f\colon X\to X$ if for any open set $U\ni x$ there is an $N>0$ such that $f^N(U)\cap U\neq\emptyset$. The…
Rhjg
  • 2,029
3
votes
0 answers

Is the Smale solenoid structurally stable?

I am taking a graduate student seminar about the Smale solenoid and it's properties. (i.e. how it is expansive, it has dense periodic points, etc). But even though it's a nice example of a weird topological space, I would still like to have some…
Bajo Fondo
  • 1,099
  • 7
  • 17
3
votes
1 answer

Linearization of differential equations system

After linearizing a system of differential equations (non-linear, on two variables), the Jacobian matrix at the equilibrium $(0,1)$ is as follows: $$ J_{(0,1)}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ \end{bmatrix} $$ As you can see, the eigenvalues are…
user401936
  • 1,071
3
votes
1 answer

How is the structure of a dynamical system identified empirically?

There are many examples in science in which a dynamical system, usually presented as a system of differential equations, is presented and claimed to be derived "empirically". I believe the heat equation is one well-known example, but the one I'm…
3
votes
2 answers

In a non-compact metric space, topological transitivity need not imply onto

Let $X$ be a compact metric space and $f:X \to X$ be continuous. If $f$ is topologically transitive. Then $f$ is onto. I'm trying to show that converse of the above is not true and the compactness hypothesis cannot be removed. To show that…
Mark
  • 649