Questions tagged [finite-fields]

Finite fields are fields (number systems with addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) with only finitely many elements. They arise in abstract algebra, number theory, and cryptography. The order of a finite field is always a prime power, and for each prime power $q$ there is a single isomorphism type. It is usually denoted by $\mathbb{F}_q$ or $\operatorname{GF}(q)$.

The order of a finite field is always a prime power, and for each prime power $q = p^r$ with $p$ prime there is a single isomorphism type. It is usually denoted by $\mathbb{F}_q$ or $\operatorname{GF}(q)$. The finite field $\mathbb F_q$ has characteristic $p$.

In the case $r = 1$ (i.e. $q = p$), a representative of $\mathbb F_p$ is given by the ring $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ of integers residue classes modulo $p$. For $r \geq 2$, $\mathbb F_q$ can be constructed by a quotient ring $\mathbb{F}_p[x]/\langle f(x)\rangle$, where $f\in\mathbb F_p[x]$ is an irreducible polynomial of degree $r$.


Questions about finite fields typically fall into one of the following groups:

1: Questions arising in introductory level courses on abstract algebra. Here abstract-algebra is a suitable related tag.

2: Questions about solvability of higher degree congruences and/or factorization of polynomials with integer coefficients modulo a prime number often need basic facts about finite fields. This kind of questions are adequately tagged with polynomials and/or elementary-number-theory. Adding a finite-fields tag may help, but may not be necessary to attract quality answers.

3: Finite fields naturally occur in algebraic-number-theory as their properties are used heavily in the study of prime ideals and their behavior under field extensions. Use the tags jointly, if you see the need for it. A rich area in the intersection of finite fields and number theory is that of characters, most notably character sums. For the latter exponential-sums is an appropriate auxiliary tag.

4: Many error-correcting codes use a finite-field as the alphabet representing data, and such codes depend heavily on the properties of the alphabet fields. Use the coding-theory tag in conjunction with finite-fields, if your question is under this umbrella. Another rich source of applications of finite fields is cryptography.

5: There are special questions considering algebraic varieties and/or algebraic groups over finite fields. Here my recommendation is to use algebraic-geometry or algebraic-groups as the primary tag, and finite-fields as an auxiliary tag. This way your question will most likely attract the attention of those members who are best placed to answer it.


WARNING1: A relatively common mistake is to assume that finite-fields is an appropriate tag for questions about finite field extensions. There the word 'finite' is an attribute of the word 'extension' meaning that the dimension of the larger field as a vector space over the smaller one is finite. If that is what your question is about, you should use some combination of the tags galois-theory, field-theory, extension-field.


WARNING2: Another common source of confusion is the following. It is a well-known fact that a finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of any field is cyclic. Thus the entire multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. Any generator $g\in\Bbb{F}_q^*$ of the multiplicative group is called a primitive element. This is a natural extension of the concept of a primitive root in the multiplicative group $\Bbb{Z}/p\Bbb{Z}^*$ of the residue class ring. Unfortunately it is in conflict with the common practice of general field theory to call an element $z\in L$ primitive (w.r.t. the field extension $K/L$), if $L=K(z)$. In the case of finite fields we require more from a primitive element.

An irreducible polynomial $m(x)\in\Bbb{F}_p$ of degree $r$, is called a primitive polynomial, if any (and hence all) of its zeros in $\Bbb{F}_q$ are primitive elements. IOW, primitive polynomials are exactly the minimal polynomials (over the prime field) of primitive elements. This is another unfortunate source of confusion, for in the theory of polynomials over PIDs a polynomial is called primitive, if its coefficients have no non-unital common divisors. This is rarely very confusing for over a field this alternative concept of primitivity is patently meaningless.

Primitive polynomials are extremely useful in software implementations of the arithmetic of a moderate size finite field. This is largely because having a primitive polynomial at hand allows one to generate look-up-tables for both the base $g$ discrete logarithm as well as its inverse function. See this CW question for examples.

For that reason extensive tables of primitive polynomials have been generated. One such table is here.


Learn more: The tome for the keen students of finite fields is the book by Rudolf Lidl and Harald Niederreiter.

5331 questions
0
votes
2 answers

The 8 field construction

Im thinking about 8 elemental field. I know about using polynoms, however, is there any possibility to construct the field with 8 elements, and these elements would be 0,1,a,b,c,d,e,f where all a,b,c,d,e,f are real numbers? Something what would…
Leechy
  • 11
0
votes
1 answer

Formal Power series of finite field

I was given a question about finite field. Let $F$ be a finite field with $q$ elements, say with characteristic $p$ and $x_k$ be the number of monic irreducible polynomials with degree $k$ in $F[x]$. Why we always have the formal power…
0
votes
1 answer

Constructing add/multi tables for GF(2)

I started learning about finite fields and came across this problem online and I haven't seen this format before: R=GF(2)[x] mod x^3 + 1 = 0 What is the x part for? The closest I've seen is GF(3) = Z, *; mod 3. And the multiplication table looks…
pfinferno
  • 307
0
votes
2 answers

Power in finite field

Does the following statement hold true for any finite field? $$a^p\equiv a \qquad(\mathbb{Z_p})$$ I have tought at it this way: all numbers in $\mathbb{Z_p}$ are $\in \{0,\mathbb{Z_p}\}$ and $p*a< a^p< p^p=p\iff a< a^p< p$ I still miss something
gbox
  • 12,867
0
votes
1 answer

What is the exponent in the definition of a Galois field called?

From what I understand, when speaking of a Galois field $\operatorname{GF}(p^k)$, $p$ is called the characteristic of the field, and $p^k$ is the order. Does $k$ have a name by itself?
glibdud
  • 103
0
votes
1 answer

Derivative of a polynomial in finite fields

In Introduction to finite fields and their applications by R.Lidl, the definition of the derivative for a polynomial such that ($a_i\in GF(q)$) $$f_{(x)}=a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_0$$ is $$f_{(x)}=na_n*x^{n-1}+\cdots +a_1 $$ It is not clear…
shampoo
  • 123
0
votes
0 answers

Algebra: Field Theory Question

I am being asked to find the following: Let $F$ denote the field $\dfrac{\mathbb{F}_2[\alpha]}{(\alpha^3 + \alpha + 1)}$. Simplify $\alpha(\alpha + 1)(\alpha + 1)$ in $F$ and calculate $\alpha^{-1}$ in $F$. I am trying to understand what exactly…
0
votes
1 answer

Prove $(F,+)$ isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}_{p}, +) \times (\mathbb{Z}_{p}, +) \times ... \times (\mathbb{Z}_{p},+)$ ( $n$ times)

Let $F$ be a field of order $p^n$ for some prime $p$ and positive integer $n$, and let $\mathbb{Z}_{p} \subset F$ be a prime field of $F$. Prove the additive group of $F$, that is the group $(F,+)$ is isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}_{p}, +) \times…
Brad Graham
  • 1,161
0
votes
1 answer

Mapping the additive group of a finite field of order $2^n$ to its multiplicative group

In a finite field $F$ of order $2^n$, we know that its additive group is isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}_2)^n$. We also know that $(\mathbb{Z}_2)^n$ can be thought of as the set of all $n$-digit binary strings with the operation of XOR. Because of this…
ASKASK
  • 9,000
  • 4
  • 28
  • 49
0
votes
1 answer

Fixed point of field automorphism

Let $F$ be a finite field of order $p^n$ for some prime $p$ and positive integer $n$. This is well known that group of field automorphism of $F$ is cyclic and generate by the following: $\alpha:F\rightarrow F$; $\alpha(x)=x^p$, how can I find the…
maryam
  • 61
-1
votes
1 answer

If f(x) is irreducible, is x + (f(x)) always a generator of the quotient field?

If $f(x)\in F[x]$ is irreducible, $F$ is a finite field, then the quotient $F[x]/(f(x))$ is a field. Is $x + (f(x))$ always a generator of this field? Meaning powers of it always generate the whole field except $0$. Does it hold or not?
-1
votes
1 answer

About the variable of the Chebyshev polynomials over finite fields

I come across the following terminology: Chebyshev polynomials over finite fields, they are used in graph theory. They have the same recurrence equation and other properties. I am confused about the variable $x$ in their definition. Is it the…
Safwane
  • 3,840
-1
votes
1 answer

Can there exist this Element in a Finite Field

How can I approach a question of the form Can there exist an element β in Zx satisfying $$ β^a= b $$ and $$ β^c= d $$? I understand how to find primitive elements of Zx and could use it to find β if I was given just 1 of these equations that…
-1
votes
3 answers

What is the order of $x+x^2$ in Multiplicative group of the field $\mathbb F_2[x]/(x^4+x^3+1)$

How do I find the order of this element? What should I use?
-1
votes
3 answers

Prove $a+a=1$ using field table

Suppose a field $F=\{0,1,a\}$, what would be the table for addition . I know that for addition table, to prove $a+a=1$
Bob
  • 25
  • 8
1 2 3
20
21