Hedman in his "A First Course in Logic" (2004) says, in p.359,
"... we now demonstrate a second-order theory containing $T_N$ that does have a decidable axiomatization." where $T_N$ is the first-order theory of arithmetic of the structure…
Context: I've been reading through the Dover English translation of Godel's paper "On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems".
It seems the key to producing Godel formulas is the generalization operation, such…
I am a math noob. These questions will likely sound dumb so I apologize ahead of time. But I like to code, and I've been getting into lisp languages. Someone wrote an introductory summary to Gödel foundations of mathematics/incompleteness theorem…
I have 3 questions and they are closely related so I asked them in same post.
With Gödel numbering we can encode statements like "0 = 0" or maybe "a then b". And this is basically just transformation of symbols or group of symbols to a unique…
Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem (GT1) states that for every algorithmic set of axioms (AlgoS) capable of expressing basic arithmetic, there exists a true arithmetical statement GS (the Gödel statement of S) that AlgoS cannot prove. This…
Godel's proof involves a statement G. I undestand that it is losely arranged to look like "This statement G is not provable in this sytem". My question is how this statement was created and used in Godel's proof. Is the statement just an…
Just a small note: I’m taking High School Geometry, so in no way am I advanced in mathematics.
Recently I’ve started a project attempting to explain Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. However I can’t seem to comprehend the difference between the 2…
I am self-learning about Godel's incompleteness theorems and think that this analogy is good:
When trying to prove that infinite primes exist we assume finite number of them exist and then we arrive at a number that cannot be built by those…
If Godel showed that a sufficiently powerful formal system can be consistent or complete but not both, is this equivalent to saying that the law of non-contradiction or the law of excluded middle cannot both hold within a system of logic.
I…
For example, we define 'what a set is' or 'what natural numbers are' using a bunch of assumptions about how they should behave. Those assumptions are all there is to the 'world or sets' or 'world of natural numbers'. So we cannot assert that a…
I'm trying to understand the Goedel's theorem. My question is to check if the following thoughts are correct.
Goedel considers the formal sistem Q which describes natural numbers with addition and multiplication without any induction axioms. If we…
The proof of the halting problem gives us a way to create, for any halting algorithm, a program that the halting algorithm does not decide.
One possible halting algorithm would be enumerating all theorems of ZFC, and checking if that theorem either…
Gödel' Incompleteness Theorem (GIT) states that certain theories $T$ (formal systems that are of sufficient complexity to express the basic arithmetic of the natural numbers and which are consistent, and effectively axiomatized) e.g. Peano…
For example Godel's Incompleteness Theorem says "Some statement in $Th(\mathbb{N})$ has no proof".
Consider sentence "This sentence is not provable".
We can encode this sentence in $Th(\mathbb{N})$.
Thus, "This sentence is not provable" $ \in…
I have two question regarding Godel's incompletness theorem. The theorem says that every axiomatic system is either incomplete or inconsistent. If it's consistent, then there are true statements that are unprovable.
If so, then it must also be the…