Questions tagged [logic]

Questions about mathematical logic, including model theory, proof theory, computability theory (a.k.a. recursion theory), and non-standard logics. Questions which merely seek to apply logical or formal reasoning to other areas of mathematics should not use this tag. Consider using one of the following tags as well, if they fit the question: (model-theory), (set-theory), (computability), and (proof-theory). This tag is not for logical puzzles, use (puzzle).

This tag broadly covers the field of mathematical logic, which deals with questions involving formalized mathematical statements, mathematical structures, and their relationships. The development of mathematical logic in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was intertwined with the interest in foundations of mathematics (), although much current work in logic is not directly related to foundations.

The elementary content of mathematical logic involves formal mathematical languages, quantifiers, and formal proofs of statements. These formal proofs are carried out in formal proof systems (see ), which model ordinary mathematical reasoning but, unlike natural language proofs, have a fully specified syntax and grammar that could in principle be verified mechanically. Specific tags for these topics include and . The full development of these ideas happens in the field of . A well known application of proof-theoretic methods is Gödel's incompleteness theorem .

The field of studies models of formal languages. Examples include algebraic structures such as groups and rings, as well as more esoteric structures. The field focuses on definability within such structures, relative to particular formal languages.

The field of studies formalized notations of computability, such as Turing computability and hyperarithmetical computability, as well as their applications to mathematics.

The field of studies sets by considering formal axiomatic systems of set theory such as ZFC. Questions about basic topics that might be found in "Chapter 0" of an undergraduate textbook (such as unions, intersections, subsets, etc.) are classified on this site as , while the includes questions about models of ZFC, large cardinals, the method of forcing, etc. Some researchers view set theory as part of mathematical logic, while others view it as a distinct area; the logic tag is not mandatory for set theory questions.

There are other areas which overlap with mathematical logic, but are not always considered part of it. The field of has many similarities to logic, and has important foundational aspects.

The foundational aspects of logic include mathematical constructivism, which is classified here as .


This tag does not include questions about ordinary logical reasoning in mathematical proof writing. Questions that ask about the logical structure or logical methods of ordinary mathematical proofs should be labeled with the tag unless they ask about specific formal proof systems.

This tag should not be used for what a layperson might called "a logical puzzle". For these sort of questions please use and as appropriate. (Unless the solution is done via a method relevant to the logic tag, of course.)

27971 questions
4
votes
1 answer

Complete omega-consistent theories

Lindenbaum's Lemma says that every consistent theory has a complete consistent extension. Can this be extended to omega-consistent theories? Does every omega-consistent theory have a complete omega-consistent extension? Does the following argument…
Keith
  • 133
4
votes
5 answers

What does it mean to "prove $1+1=2$"?

It is a famous bit of trivia that it took Russell and Whitehead about 300 pages to prove that $1+1 = 2$. However, this seems more like a definition rather than theorem. As far as I know, $2$ is just the symbol we use as shorthand for $1+1$, where…
Ovi
  • 23,737
4
votes
1 answer

What is strong homomorphism?

On pg. 26 of Mathematical Logic notes of Lou van den Dries, there is a definition, however as a beginner I do not understand the difference between $homomorphism$ and $strong$ $homomorphism$. Could you give me specific examples for both so that I…
Tedebbur
  • 353
4
votes
1 answer

Infinity graph, $k$ colours. Prove that it is possible to colour it.

Firstly, I write theorem: If infinite set of first-order predicate is contradictory, at least one of its finite subset is contrary. Now, I must use this theorem to prove following thing: Lets consider infinite graph $G=(V,E)$ such that each finite…
user343207
4
votes
2 answers

Are truth tables legitimate proofs?

Are truth tables seen as rigorous enough for proofs? I was just wondering because I am not sure if they suffice for a proof.
jasonL
  • 313
4
votes
1 answer

Shoenfield's Mathematical logic book Proof of Herbrand's Theorem

I have trouble understanding the first lemma proof of the Herbrand's theorem section of the book. The proof of the lemma starts with a closed existential formula A and proves that A is a theorem iff T[$\neg$ B] is inconsistent, where B is the…
doze
  • 45
4
votes
1 answer

What is the relationship between non-monotonic and substructural logics?

A little clarification is probably required. By "non-monotonic logic", I have in mind the various formal treatments of commonsense entailment that have popped up in AI over the years (e.g. Default logic, autoepistemic logic, circumscription, etc.)…
user279406
4
votes
1 answer

Is every decidable set really enumerable?

My textbook on mathematical logic states: "every decidable set is enumerable", and that it is decidable if and only if it is enumerable and its complement is also enumerable. Decidable is defined roughly as: $W$ (subset of $A$) is decidable if…
user56834
  • 12,925
4
votes
5 answers

Liar or truth teller? Logic question

In a certain country every inhabitant is either a truth teller (who always tells the truth) or a liar (who always lies). Traveling in this country you meet two of the inhabitants, Pat and Mel. Pat says, “If I am a truth teller, then Mel is a truth…
Kenta
  • 217
4
votes
5 answers

Conditional statements?

My textbook states that for the conditional statement "p implies q", "p is a sufficient condition for q and q is a necessary condition for p." How is this so? One might be lead to believe that p is independent of q and that it is a necessary and…
user361896
4
votes
6 answers

Identifying propositions?

I have been asked to identify whether the following sentence is a proposition or not: (in accordance with this definition) "Tomorrow is Monday." For any given day of the week, this sentence will either be true or false, but it most definitely can…
user361896
4
votes
2 answers

Notion of truth in logic

I've been studying Gödel's incompleteness theorems and I am stuck with the Tarskian notion of truth. I 've searched all over the internet, in books, in relevant topics here , but I didn't find a satisfactory answer. Ok , let me state exactly what my…
Kostas Kartas
  • 313
  • 2
  • 6
4
votes
3 answers

Proof With and Without Truth Tables

$(6)$ Use truth tables to determine whether or not the following argument is correct: "If the tax rate and the unemployment rate both go up, then there will be a recession. If the GNP goes up, then there will not be a recession. The GNP and taxes…
Moderat
  • 4,437
4
votes
1 answer

Prove that acl(acl(A))=acl(A), in model theory

Can someone give me an elementary proof of this fact? Edit: This is an exercise in Marker's text, right after he defines $$\text{acl}(A)=\{x:x \text{ is algebraic over }A\}.$$ The question and the full definition is here.
4
votes
2 answers

What is the correct negation of the Statement "For every rational number $x$, $x \lt x + 1$ "

They statement is $:-$ For every rational number $x$, $x \lt x + 1$ At first glance my answer was $:-$ There exists a rational number $x$ such that $x \geq x + 1$ But then i saw this $p : \sqrt{11}$ is rational ~$p$ : $\sqrt{11}$ is not…
user312097