Questions tagged [logic]

Questions about mathematical logic, including model theory, proof theory, computability theory (a.k.a. recursion theory), and non-standard logics. Questions which merely seek to apply logical or formal reasoning to other areas of mathematics should not use this tag. Consider using one of the following tags as well, if they fit the question: (model-theory), (set-theory), (computability), and (proof-theory). This tag is not for logical puzzles, use (puzzle).

This tag broadly covers the field of mathematical logic, which deals with questions involving formalized mathematical statements, mathematical structures, and their relationships. The development of mathematical logic in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was intertwined with the interest in foundations of mathematics (), although much current work in logic is not directly related to foundations.

The elementary content of mathematical logic involves formal mathematical languages, quantifiers, and formal proofs of statements. These formal proofs are carried out in formal proof systems (see ), which model ordinary mathematical reasoning but, unlike natural language proofs, have a fully specified syntax and grammar that could in principle be verified mechanically. Specific tags for these topics include and . The full development of these ideas happens in the field of . A well known application of proof-theoretic methods is Gödel's incompleteness theorem .

The field of studies models of formal languages. Examples include algebraic structures such as groups and rings, as well as more esoteric structures. The field focuses on definability within such structures, relative to particular formal languages.

The field of studies formalized notations of computability, such as Turing computability and hyperarithmetical computability, as well as their applications to mathematics.

The field of studies sets by considering formal axiomatic systems of set theory such as ZFC. Questions about basic topics that might be found in "Chapter 0" of an undergraduate textbook (such as unions, intersections, subsets, etc.) are classified on this site as , while the includes questions about models of ZFC, large cardinals, the method of forcing, etc. Some researchers view set theory as part of mathematical logic, while others view it as a distinct area; the logic tag is not mandatory for set theory questions.

There are other areas which overlap with mathematical logic, but are not always considered part of it. The field of has many similarities to logic, and has important foundational aspects.

The foundational aspects of logic include mathematical constructivism, which is classified here as .


This tag does not include questions about ordinary logical reasoning in mathematical proof writing. Questions that ask about the logical structure or logical methods of ordinary mathematical proofs should be labeled with the tag unless they ask about specific formal proof systems.

This tag should not be used for what a layperson might called "a logical puzzle". For these sort of questions please use and as appropriate. (Unless the solution is done via a method relevant to the logic tag, of course.)

27971 questions
2
votes
3 answers

$\exists x \forall y (P(y) \implies Q(x))$ and $\forall y P(y) \implies \exists x Q(x)$ are not logically equivalent

I am trying to show that the following are not logically equivalent (according to a practice question) $\exists x \forall y (P(y) \implies Q(x))$ and $\forall y P(y) \implies \exists x Q(x)$ In the first case I am trying to find some kind of…
2
votes
1 answer

How do you deduce X given a set of truth value?

given some truth value, how can we indeed deduce what the form is like? For example, P Q R X T T T T T T F F T F T T T F F T F T T T F T F F F F T F F F F T Here, given the truth value of X, can you deduce the form of X in term of P,Q,R?? I think…
john
  • 43
2
votes
2 answers

Theories question

The question: Let $L=${S}, S is a two-place relation. I need to show that there exists a theory - $T$, in the vocabulary L such that for each structure $M$ to interpret $L$: $M\models T \leftrightarrow S^M$ is a partial order on the world and on the…
rain11
  • 29
2
votes
3 answers

Is this correct arguing?

Is this correct to conclude this way? Premise $\neg p$ Premise $(\neg p \vee q) \to r$ Therefore $\neg p \wedge (\neg p \vee q) \to r$ Therefore $\neg p \to r$
Etush
  • 105
2
votes
2 answers

A little doubt on the usage of the $(=\; elim)$ rule?

I'm reading Language, Proof and Logic. I'm trying to understand this proof: "= Intro" and "= Elim" are: I understand the use of "= Intro" in the proof, but how exactly are we using "= Elim"? What is $p(n)$? I suspect $p(n) := [n=b]$. So we…
Red Banana
  • 23,956
  • 20
  • 91
  • 192
2
votes
1 answer

What is the general structure of an argument?

On Wikipedia it is given that In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements (in a natural language), called the premises or premisses (both spellings are acceptable), intended to determine the degree of truth of another statement,…
Navneet
  • 519
  • 2
  • 11
2
votes
1 answer

A problem on logic statements

I have series of statement that can logically be true($1$) or false($0$). For example if I have just one statement i.e Statement $1$ is false. Statement $1$ says that itself is false which is contradictory, so I can conclude that the statement…
user31280
2
votes
1 answer

What does $X \not \models \beta$ really mean?

I have a question. Let X be some set. Let $v$ be valuation. I saw definition which says that $X \models \beta$ means that for any valuation $v$: if $v(X)\subseteq\{1\}$, then $v(\beta)=1$. Question 1. Does $()\subseteq \{1\}$ mean at the same…
2
votes
1 answer

Maximal consistent set. Decomposition lemma

Let $\Gamma$ be a maximal consistent set. Prove: $\varphi \lor \psi \in \Gamma \iff \varphi \in \Gamma $ or $ \psi \in \Gamma$. Now define $V_{\Gamma}: Q \to \{ 0, 1 \}$ as follows: $V_{\Gamma}(p):= \cases{{1 \mbox{ if } p \in \Gamma} \\ 0…
Jeroen
  • 1,653
2
votes
1 answer

Discrete Mathematics > The Logic of Quantified Statements > Predicates and Quantified Statements > Negation of A Universal Conditional Statement

There are various questions in this topic, but none were covering my particular question. Can you please help me with the following: I have a Universal Conditional Statement (Universal Implication). Please note that it is NOT a simple straight…
2
votes
1 answer

Declarative statements

Is there some branch of mathematics that works with truth bearing statements instead of variables, and defines operations between them? Basically I am looking for some well known system that defines true or false statements like variables and has…
Ethan Splaver
  • 10,613
2
votes
1 answer

How to show that quantity quantifiers are not definable in first-order logic without equality?

In first-order logic with equality, we can define "there exists at least $n$ objects $x$ such that $P(x)$", for each specific positive integer $n$. However, I think this probably can't be done in first-order logic without equality, except for the…
user107952
  • 20,508
2
votes
3 answers

Write the negation of the statement "xy is even implies that x or y is even."

I figured that implications statements can be written as: P implies Q meaning that if P then Q And I thought the negation of if-then statements can be written in the format: p and not q Hence I thought that the negation would be: "xy is even and x…
Sammy
  • 103
2
votes
1 answer

Does this implication involving real numbers $a$, $b$ hold?

Suppose $a$ and $b$ are real numbers that satisfy all of the following properties: $a\neq 0$ It is not the case that both $a<0$ and $b<0$. Symbolically, $\neg(a<0\wedge b<0)$. It is not the case that both $a=0$ and $b=0$. Symbolically,…
Alann Rosas
  • 5,421
  • 1
  • 9
  • 28
2
votes
0 answers

How to use basic logical symbols

I have a question about basic logical symbols. You can only use these symbols and I am trying to use them for this question, where $x \in \mathbb R$: $⇒$, $=$, $⇔$ $a)$ $1 < x$ symbol $1 ≤ x$ $b)$ $x < 0$ symbol $0 < x^2$ $c)$ $0 < x^2$ symbol $x ≠…
zellez11
  • 287