Questions tagged [logic]

Questions about mathematical logic, including model theory, proof theory, computability theory (a.k.a. recursion theory), and non-standard logics. Questions which merely seek to apply logical or formal reasoning to other areas of mathematics should not use this tag. Consider using one of the following tags as well, if they fit the question: (model-theory), (set-theory), (computability), and (proof-theory). This tag is not for logical puzzles, use (puzzle).

This tag broadly covers the field of mathematical logic, which deals with questions involving formalized mathematical statements, mathematical structures, and their relationships. The development of mathematical logic in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was intertwined with the interest in foundations of mathematics (), although much current work in logic is not directly related to foundations.

The elementary content of mathematical logic involves formal mathematical languages, quantifiers, and formal proofs of statements. These formal proofs are carried out in formal proof systems (see ), which model ordinary mathematical reasoning but, unlike natural language proofs, have a fully specified syntax and grammar that could in principle be verified mechanically. Specific tags for these topics include and . The full development of these ideas happens in the field of . A well known application of proof-theoretic methods is Gödel's incompleteness theorem .

The field of studies models of formal languages. Examples include algebraic structures such as groups and rings, as well as more esoteric structures. The field focuses on definability within such structures, relative to particular formal languages.

The field of studies formalized notations of computability, such as Turing computability and hyperarithmetical computability, as well as their applications to mathematics.

The field of studies sets by considering formal axiomatic systems of set theory such as ZFC. Questions about basic topics that might be found in "Chapter 0" of an undergraduate textbook (such as unions, intersections, subsets, etc.) are classified on this site as , while the includes questions about models of ZFC, large cardinals, the method of forcing, etc. Some researchers view set theory as part of mathematical logic, while others view it as a distinct area; the logic tag is not mandatory for set theory questions.

There are other areas which overlap with mathematical logic, but are not always considered part of it. The field of has many similarities to logic, and has important foundational aspects.

The foundational aspects of logic include mathematical constructivism, which is classified here as .


This tag does not include questions about ordinary logical reasoning in mathematical proof writing. Questions that ask about the logical structure or logical methods of ordinary mathematical proofs should be labeled with the tag unless they ask about specific formal proof systems.

This tag should not be used for what a layperson might called "a logical puzzle". For these sort of questions please use and as appropriate. (Unless the solution is done via a method relevant to the logic tag, of course.)

27971 questions
2
votes
1 answer

Equivalence of logical inconsistency

Let $\mathcal{L}$ be a sentential language. Consider the set $\Sigma$ of sentences. We want to show that $\Sigma$ is inconsistent if and only if $\Sigma \vdash S \wedge \neg S$ for any simple symbol in $\mathcal{L}$. The forward implication is…
2
votes
1 answer

What happens to the notion of semantic entailment in logics other than boolean?

Suppose we have a logic with three or more truth values, how can we deal with semantic entailment then? From what I understand a set of statements A, semantically entails B if B cannot be false if all in A are true. But this assumes we are dealing…
Threnody
  • 898
2
votes
1 answer

Example from "Beginner Logic" (E.J.Lemmon)

$\newcommand{\ass}[2]{ #1 \qquad &(#1)#2 \qquad & A }$ $\newcommand{\di}[4]{ #4 \qquad &(#1)#2 \lor #3 \qquad & #4 \lor I }$ $\newcommand{\mpp}[4]{ #4 \qquad &(#1)#2 \qquad & #3MPP }$ $\newcommand{\de}[5]{ #5 \qquad &(#1) #2 \lor #3 \qquad & #4 \lor…
2
votes
4 answers

Confirm the following: if $\forall x \, P(x)$ then $\exists x\ P(x)$

I tried to find the answer to this question, but surprisingly, I was unable to. I just want to confirm that if something is true for all objects in a set, it is certainly true for some objects in a set. Mostly, I want to make sure that I am…
S.C.
  • 4,984
2
votes
0 answers

What's the odd one out in the following patterns?

I encountered a pattern recognition problem as described in the following picture. My choice would be B. My rationale is based on the logic of grouping and elimination. First, I grouped the patterns into three groups, namely, the group of one dot…
2
votes
1 answer

Instruments for getting Skolem normal form

I have a problem to solve: $\forall x[\neg P(x) \land \forall y \neg Q(x,y) \rightarrow \forall x \forall y R(x,y,z)]$ I see that two quantifiers are influencing on the exact same variable.That's why I'm to make a change of variables: x change to…
Elvin
  • 220
  • 1
  • 9
2
votes
0 answers

primitive recursive function

Consider the set of terms in the language of arithmetic built from the constant 0, and the functions $'$, +, and $\cdot$. Each such term is of course equal to some numeral (i.e., term of the form $0'''^{...} $.) Is the function that takes the Godel…
2
votes
2 answers

Prove Γ ⊢ ¬¬φ is formally provable from Γ ⊢ φ

This is a mathematical logic problem on the Sequent Calculus Γ ⊢ φ Γ ⊢ ¬¬φ (Prove Γ ⊢ ¬¬φ is formally provable from Γ ⊢ φ ) Since "¬¬" is not generated by any of the rules, I have tried to use the Assumption Rule (Asm) and the Contradiction Rule 2…
Sean
  • 373
2
votes
2 answers

Are there provably true statements which $\textit{don't}$ have a non-trivial proof by contradiction?

... where a trivial proof by contradiction means effectively using a different proof technique to establish that the statement is true, and since you've assumed it's false, it's a contradiction. Aside from that, the title pretty much says it all: do…
Trevor
  • 6,022
  • 15
  • 35
2
votes
2 answers

Origin of self-reference in math

I'm wondering about how self-reference enters in the math used in Godel's incompleteness theorem (GIT), for example. From what I've read so far about GIT, self-reference enters the conversation by saying words like, "It's possible to construct" or…
2
votes
1 answer

Contrapositive of the Transitive Property of Equality

My teacher asked us to find the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the transitive property of equality. $\text{If }x = y\text{ and }y = z\text{, then }x = z$ My answer is $\text{If }x \neq z\text{, then }y \neq z\text{ or }x \neq z$ The…
2
votes
1 answer

Bijection and Natural elements

I'm trying to establish that the set of $L_{PA}$ terms and $p$ an element of the $N[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ where $N$ = naturals, for some $n$ in the Naturals are in a bijection. Well, the $L_{PA}$ terms really contain the class of successors, addition and…
mary
  • 2,374
2
votes
2 answers

The soundness of modus ponens (?)

I've been told that a proof can be provided to the effect that modus ponens is a sound logical principle. I know that modus ponens is a valid principle in classical logical but I can't see what it could mean for a logical principle to be sound. As a…
Mijito
  • 235
2
votes
1 answer

Is my logical statement correct?

Wolf’s A Mathematical Tour Through Mathematical Logic, Section 1.3, Exercise 5: Exercise 5. Translate the following statements into symbolic form, as in the previous example. (a) All crows are black, but not all black things are crows. (b) If…
Atom
  • 3,905
2
votes
1 answer

Validity of argument when tautology or contradiction is included

a) $1+1=2$ is tautology? A formula is said to be a Tautology if every truth assignment to its component statements results in the formula being true $1+1=2$ can be represented by single propositional variable (e.g. $P$) and $P$ can be true or…
firia2000
  • 257