Questions tagged [logic]

Questions about mathematical logic, including model theory, proof theory, computability theory (a.k.a. recursion theory), and non-standard logics. Questions which merely seek to apply logical or formal reasoning to other areas of mathematics should not use this tag. Consider using one of the following tags as well, if they fit the question: (model-theory), (set-theory), (computability), and (proof-theory). This tag is not for logical puzzles, use (puzzle).

This tag broadly covers the field of mathematical logic, which deals with questions involving formalized mathematical statements, mathematical structures, and their relationships. The development of mathematical logic in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was intertwined with the interest in foundations of mathematics (), although much current work in logic is not directly related to foundations.

The elementary content of mathematical logic involves formal mathematical languages, quantifiers, and formal proofs of statements. These formal proofs are carried out in formal proof systems (see ), which model ordinary mathematical reasoning but, unlike natural language proofs, have a fully specified syntax and grammar that could in principle be verified mechanically. Specific tags for these topics include and . The full development of these ideas happens in the field of . A well known application of proof-theoretic methods is Gödel's incompleteness theorem .

The field of studies models of formal languages. Examples include algebraic structures such as groups and rings, as well as more esoteric structures. The field focuses on definability within such structures, relative to particular formal languages.

The field of studies formalized notations of computability, such as Turing computability and hyperarithmetical computability, as well as their applications to mathematics.

The field of studies sets by considering formal axiomatic systems of set theory such as ZFC. Questions about basic topics that might be found in "Chapter 0" of an undergraduate textbook (such as unions, intersections, subsets, etc.) are classified on this site as , while the includes questions about models of ZFC, large cardinals, the method of forcing, etc. Some researchers view set theory as part of mathematical logic, while others view it as a distinct area; the logic tag is not mandatory for set theory questions.

There are other areas which overlap with mathematical logic, but are not always considered part of it. The field of has many similarities to logic, and has important foundational aspects.

The foundational aspects of logic include mathematical constructivism, which is classified here as .


This tag does not include questions about ordinary logical reasoning in mathematical proof writing. Questions that ask about the logical structure or logical methods of ordinary mathematical proofs should be labeled with the tag unless they ask about specific formal proof systems.

This tag should not be used for what a layperson might called "a logical puzzle". For these sort of questions please use and as appropriate. (Unless the solution is done via a method relevant to the logic tag, of course.)

27971 questions
2
votes
0 answers

Property of finite sequences of sentences

Sorry if this was asked before, I couldn't find. So, I'm reading Hinman's Book "Fundamentals of Mathematical Logic" and I've got stucked in the beginning, more precisely at page 16, proposition 1.1.5. He's proving the unique readability for…
Xablau123
  • 156
2
votes
1 answer

Different Negations of Self-referential Propositions

On Page 33, The Liar: an Essay on Truth and Circularity, (Barwise and Etchemendy, 1987) Exercise 6 Explain how the claims made by the following sentences differ.$$\lnot\downarrow\mathbf{True(this)}$$$$\downarrow\lnot\mathbf{True(this)}$$Is…
2
votes
2 answers

Tautologies in First Order Logic

So I am asked to put together a tautology that accurately reflects a substitution instance in First Order Logic for the the following sentence: “If I have two dollars, I can buy a soda, and if I have two dollars, then I can buy a candy bar, so if…
Ram
  • 83
2
votes
2 answers

What is a Complex Name?

On Page 38, Elementary Set Theory with a Universal Set, Randall Holmes(2012), which can be found here. We give a semi-formal definition of complex names (this is a variation on Bertrand Russell's Theory of Descriptions): Definition. A sentence …
2
votes
1 answer

Example of a formal system that is complete but not strongly complete

A formal system is complete with respect to a semantics, if all validities are derivable (i.e. if $\ \vDash\phi\ $ then $\ \vdash\phi$). A formal system is strongly complete with respect to a semantics, if for every set of formulas $\Gamma$, the…
LoMaPh
  • 1,361
2
votes
0 answers

Proper term for a variable whose value affects the output of another variable?

Assume a given variable, $x$, has a value that is a function of a set of variables, $a, b, c$. $a, b,$ and $c$ can be said to be the independent variables. However often times in modelling real life scenarios, $a, b,$ and $c$ will have values…
user1299028
  • 211
  • 2
  • 9
2
votes
0 answers

Why are proofs based on the 2 classical logics?

Mathematics recognizes that there are logics different from the propositional logic and the predicate logic. I have studied a few of them myself. Then... why are all proofs in math textbooks based on propositional and predicate logics only? I…
peter.petrov
  • 12,568
2
votes
1 answer

Applying "not" across brackets in natural deduction for propositional logic

I have a quick question. How can I simplify $\neg(\neg P \lor (\neg Q \land \neg R))$ to $P \lor \neg(\neg Q \land \neg R))$ in natural deduction for propositional logic, and is this even allowed? What kinds of proofs would I have to use? Thanks in…
2
votes
1 answer

quantifier translation

how can i translate this sentence to a quantifier formula, when the universe - { o|o is a set } Any master has as elements all and only sets which are not elements of themselves. i know it starts of with an existential quantifier since its dealing…
user7779
2
votes
0 answers

Prove that $ \ \forall x \exists y \ P(x,y) \ $ and $ \ \exists y \forall x \ P(x,y) \ $ are not equivalent

Prove that $ \ \forall x \exists y \ P(x,y) \ $ and $ \ \exists y \forall x \ P(x,y) \ $ are not logically not equivalent in the domain $ \ \{-1,0,1 \} \ $. Answer: Let, $ x=\{-1,0,1 \} \\ y=\{-1,0,1 \} $ Let $ P(x,y) \ $ be the property such…
MAS
  • 10,638
2
votes
1 answer

quantificational translation

symbolize the following in Lg using the the interruption function below. U: {o|o is a person} L2: { , m loves n} H1: { p|o, o is exaited} C1: {o|o, o is a kid b: Bob "if any loves Bob, then Bob loves everyone." if theres a x (Lxb -->…
Lulluu
2
votes
2 answers

What is the relation between consistency and soundness in mathematical logic?

Are consistency and soundness the same or some how related in mathematical logic?
K. Smith
  • 137
2
votes
1 answer

Show that there is a formula $A$ such that $T_{\Sigma \cup A}$ and $T_{\Sigma \cup \lnot A}$ are both consistent.

Let $\Sigma=\{A,B,C,D,E\}$ $A\equiv \forall x e(x,x)$ $B\equiv \forall x \forall y e(x,y) \to e(y,x)$ $C\equiv \forall x \forall y \forall z( e(x,y) \land e(y,z))\to e(x,z)$ $D\equiv \forall x \forall ye(x,y)\to e(f(x),f(y))$ $E\equiv \forall x…
asddf
  • 1,733
2
votes
1 answer

Is satisfiability in First order logic always semi decidable?

I know that finding whether a formula is unsatisfiable or a tautology is a semidecidable problem. But what about finding out if a formula is satisfiable ?
asddf
  • 1,733
2
votes
2 answers

Proving deduction theorem without a system

The semantic version of the deduction theorem says $\Sigma ,A\vDash B$ iff $\Sigma \vDash(A\to B)$ I know that there exists proof for this in formal systems. But how can i prove this without using a system.
asddf
  • 1,733