Questions tagged [logic]

Questions about mathematical logic, including model theory, proof theory, computability theory (a.k.a. recursion theory), and non-standard logics. Questions which merely seek to apply logical or formal reasoning to other areas of mathematics should not use this tag. Consider using one of the following tags as well, if they fit the question: (model-theory), (set-theory), (computability), and (proof-theory). This tag is not for logical puzzles, use (puzzle).

This tag broadly covers the field of mathematical logic, which deals with questions involving formalized mathematical statements, mathematical structures, and their relationships. The development of mathematical logic in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was intertwined with the interest in foundations of mathematics (), although much current work in logic is not directly related to foundations.

The elementary content of mathematical logic involves formal mathematical languages, quantifiers, and formal proofs of statements. These formal proofs are carried out in formal proof systems (see ), which model ordinary mathematical reasoning but, unlike natural language proofs, have a fully specified syntax and grammar that could in principle be verified mechanically. Specific tags for these topics include and . The full development of these ideas happens in the field of . A well known application of proof-theoretic methods is Gödel's incompleteness theorem .

The field of studies models of formal languages. Examples include algebraic structures such as groups and rings, as well as more esoteric structures. The field focuses on definability within such structures, relative to particular formal languages.

The field of studies formalized notations of computability, such as Turing computability and hyperarithmetical computability, as well as their applications to mathematics.

The field of studies sets by considering formal axiomatic systems of set theory such as ZFC. Questions about basic topics that might be found in "Chapter 0" of an undergraduate textbook (such as unions, intersections, subsets, etc.) are classified on this site as , while the includes questions about models of ZFC, large cardinals, the method of forcing, etc. Some researchers view set theory as part of mathematical logic, while others view it as a distinct area; the logic tag is not mandatory for set theory questions.

There are other areas which overlap with mathematical logic, but are not always considered part of it. The field of has many similarities to logic, and has important foundational aspects.

The foundational aspects of logic include mathematical constructivism, which is classified here as .


This tag does not include questions about ordinary logical reasoning in mathematical proof writing. Questions that ask about the logical structure or logical methods of ordinary mathematical proofs should be labeled with the tag unless they ask about specific formal proof systems.

This tag should not be used for what a layperson might called "a logical puzzle". For these sort of questions please use and as appropriate. (Unless the solution is done via a method relevant to the logic tag, of course.)

27971 questions
1
vote
1 answer

separating propositons with commas?

From Kaye's Mathematics Logic, about notation for propositional logic: Another place where we relax notation is in the notation on the left hand side of a turnstile symbol $\vdash$. Instead of using set theory notation with $\{\ldots\}, \cup, ∅$,…
Tim
  • 47,382
1
vote
2 answers

What is a well built formula?

I am just beginning with Propositional Logic, and trying to understand few concepts: Well-built formula. If $3 + 2 = x$ , $\sqrt{5} − 3 > 2$, $x^2 + 2x − 1 = 0$ are atoms, then: $$((3 + 2 = x) \land (x^2+ 2x − 1 = 0)) ⇒(\sqrt{5} − 3 > 2)$$ is a…
gpuguy
  • 631
1
vote
1 answer

Can True and False be represented without quantifies?

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic#Logical_symbols Sometimes the truth constants T, Vpq, or ⊤, for "true" and F, Opq, or ⊥, for "false" are included. Without any such logical operators of valence 0, these two constants can only be…
Tim
  • 47,382
1
vote
2 answers

Are variables logical or non-logical symbols in a logic system?

Are variables logical or non-logical symbols in a logic system? I understand constants are 0-ary logical operation symbols. I think variables are non-logical symbols. But here are two contrary examples: It seems that variables are logical symbols…
Tim
  • 47,382
1
vote
0 answers

Conjunctive Normal Form representation/ First Order Logic.

in my research problem, I need to represent three types of three types of relationships between the variables x,y as the following:: " y Cooperates with x" relationship: means if there is two variables x,y. then the increasing of satisfaction of x…
1
vote
0 answers

How to simplify this term? (KV-Diagram)

I've got the following term and preconditions: Preconditions: a <= b && x <= y The term: x <= a && y >= a || x <= b && y >= b || x >= a && y <= b (|| = OR, && = AND) From my computer science studies (a few years ago) I remembered to use a…
1
vote
1 answer

Predicate logic: Two variables - same value allowed?

I have the following formula: $\exists y \forall x ((x \geq y) \wedge \neg(y \geq x))$ This essentially boils down to: $\exists y \forall x (x > y)$ I have to check whether this applies to certain universes. But my result depends on whether I can…
Franz
  • 249
1
vote
1 answer

Rule about inference rules unclear in context of inverse implication

So, I'm stuyding up on discrete math (http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-042j-mathematics-for-computer-science-fall-2010/) and came across the following explanation of what it means for an inference rule to be…
Apeiron
  • 603
  • 4
  • 13
1
vote
1 answer

Prove or disprove $ \exists x \in S [ p(x) \land q(x)] \iff [\exists x \in S p(x)] \land [\exists x \in S q(x)] $

I proved it as follows. Can anybody tell me if it is correct or wrong? Assume $ \exists x \in S [ p(x) \land q(x)] $ , Let $ x_0 \in S, st [ p(x_0) \land q(x_0)]$ $p(x_0)$ and $ q(x_0) $ Let x =$x_0$ p(x) and q(x) $[\exists x \in S, p(x)]$ and …
S.Dan
  • 1,115
1
vote
2 answers

$(\forall x\in S)P(x)\equiv \forall x(x\in S\Rightarrow P(x))$ What does it mean?

$(\forall x\in S)P(x)\equiv \forall x(x\in S\Rightarrow P(x))\\(\exists x\in S)P(x)\equiv \exists x(x\in S\wedge P(x))$ What I think it means: 1) For all $x$ in $S$, $P(x)$ holds true = for all $x$, such that, if $x$ is in $S$, then $P(x)$ holds…
1
vote
0 answers

Divisibility is not definable over $\mathbb{N}$ with coprimality relation

I am asked to show that the divisibility relation "|" is not definable over $(\mathbb{N},\perp)$, where "$\perp$" is the coprimality relation. I am pretty sure that I should use the following: Let $M$ be a structure, $F$ an automorphism of $M$ and…
aerdna91
  • 1,144
  • 6
  • 19
1
vote
1 answer

Can a predicate in logic operate on something undefined ? Is $P(x)$ true or false for $x$ undefined, where $P$ is a predicate?

Can a predicate in logic operate on something undefined ? Is $P(x)$ true or false for $x$ undefined, where $P$ is a predicate ? To be more concrete: Is $x \le 5$ true or false for $x$ undefined ? Does $\{i \in \mathbb Z \mid P(i)\}$ contain negative…
Mikkel
  • 13
1
vote
1 answer

How to prove this expression in mathematical logic

How to prove that the problem is a tautology, using only replacement by equivalence(s) (1. negation, 2. distribution, 3. de Morgan's laws, 4. $x\leftrightarrow y\equiv(x\rightarrow y)\wedge(y\rightarrow x)$, 5. $x\rightarrow y\equiv\neg y\rightarrow…
1
vote
1 answer

"If... then" equivalence

This website states that the equivalent statement to if A then B is if NOT B then NOT A This doesn't make sense. I also am a bit confused about the truth table for an if then statement, as I have different answers from different websites. UofT's…
Jason
  • 3,563
1
vote
2 answers

Confusion with logic (Continued from "Is $1/(x-2)$ not differentiable at 2"?)

I opened this question because I am still very confused by the answers and the comments from the following post: differentiability check. In the problem, the OP asks the following simple question: "What is the number of points at which $f(x)…
Braindead
  • 4,999