Questions tagged [relations]

For questions concerning partial orders, equivalence relations, properties of relations (transitive, symmetric, etc), a composition of relations, or anything else concerning a relation on a set.

A relation $R$ on a set $X \times Y$ (sometimes also called a relation between $X$ and $Y$) is any subset of $X\times Y$. So a relation is any set of ordered pairs $(x,y)$ such that $x\in X$ and $y \in Y$. Often we write $x\mathrel R y$ instead of $(x,y)\in R$. Sometimes we say a relation is defined on a single set $X$, but this just means that we're letting the relation $R$ be a subset of $X \times X$.

Here are some examples of relations:

  • For a very abstract example of a relation, take $X = \{1,2,3\}$ and $Y = \{a,b,c,d\}$, and let $R = \{(1,b),(3,c),(3,d),(2,c),(2,d)\}$. This $R$ is a relation on $X \times Y$. Fun fact, there are $2^{12}$ distinct relations you could put on $X \times Y$.

  • A function $f\colon X\to Y$ can be defined as a relation on $X \times Y$. The pairs in $X \times Y$ that are members of the relation are the input-output pairs $(x, f(x))$.

  • A partial order is a relation that mimics the notion of one element being greater/less than the other. An example of a partial order is the relation $\leq$ on $\mathbf{Z} \times \mathbf{Z}$ where for two integers $n$ and $m$ we say $n \leq m$ if $n$ is less than or equal to $m$.

  • Given a set $X$, let $\mathcal{P}(X)$ denote the set of all subsets of $X$. We can define a partial order $\subseteq$ on $\mathcal{P}(X)$ by saying that for two susbsets $A$ and $B$ of $X$, $A \subseteq B$ if $A$ is a subset of $B$.

  • An equivalence relation is a relation that mimics the notion of two things being "equal". For example, on the set $\mathbf{Z}$ of integers let's define the relation $\equiv_{37}$ on $\mathbf{Z}\times \mathbf{Z}$ by saying $a\equiv_{37} b$ if both $a$ and $b$ give the same remainder when divided by $37$. If $a \equiv_{37} b$ we say that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $37$.

  • Let $T$ be the set of all triangles in the plane. An example of an equivalence relation on $T$ is the relation of two triangles being congruent.

4661 questions
1
vote
2 answers

Why is $R=\{(1,6),\,(2,7),\,(3,8)\}$ a transitive relation?

Can someone please clear me transitive relations. books too have confused some say this is not as there are no pair to look for transitivity .While the true answer is it is but i couldn't understand why????
1
vote
1 answer

How can an antisymmetric relation be not reflexive?

Reading a book (I do not know if I can mention its title) I found these definition (the following is exactly the quotation from the pages of the book): "For a binary relation R on a set Y, that is, R⊆YxY, it is customary to write xRy rather than…
user98139
  • 119
1
vote
0 answers

Given two Numbers, Finding Relation to third

I'm trying to find the relation of three numbers. I know that two numbers have a relation that equate to the third. The tricky part is that they don't have to equal the third number exactly,but should be very close ($\pm 5$). The data I've collected…
iJeep
  • 111
  • 2
1
vote
4 answers

Proof: $R^n=R$ where $R$ is relation

I have a problem with this exercise: Proove that if $R$ is a reflexive and transitive relation then $R^n=R$ for each $n \ge 1$ (where $R^n \equiv \underbrace {R \times R \times R \times \cdots \times R} _{n \ \text{times}}$). This exercise comes…
1
vote
1 answer

prove or disprove reflexive of $R$

How to prove or disprove that if $R^2$ is reflexive then also $R$ is reflexive ? I tried to prove $R^2 \supseteq (x,x)\forall x \in R\implies R_{rex}$ but without success, maybe I have to find counetrexample?
lllook
  • 217
1
vote
1 answer

Properties of Relation: x is a multiple of y

The relation R is on the set of all integers, where (x,y) is an element of R if and only if x is a multiple of y. Would this relation be reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and/or transitive? I have determined it to be reflexive, antisymmetric, and…
ohbrobig
  • 223
1
vote
1 answer

How can I prove $R^T\ ;R^T$ is transitive if $R$ is transitive.

If $R$ is transitive relation. How can I prove that composition of its transpose is also transitive. i.e. $R^T\ ;R^T$ is transitive too.
TechJ
  • 295
1
vote
2 answers

How to find equivalence class of this relation?

In solving this problem: Let $R$ be an equivalence relation on the set $A = \{a,b,c,d\}$, defined by partitions $P = \{\{a,d\},\{b,c\}\}$. Determine the elements of the equivalence relation and also find the equivalence classes of $R$. I found…
Code Man
  • 119
1
vote
1 answer

number of relations when set is simultaneously reflexive and symmetric

I have this problem: You are given the set A = {a, b, c, d, e}. Find the number of relations R ⊆ A × A, which are 10pt simultaneously reflexive and symmetric. and this is my solution: We have set A = {a, b, c, d, e} and R ⊆ A × A (this is a…
ben
  • 67
1
vote
0 answers

Interesting relation on element of matrices, is it an equivalence relation?

Let $A\in \Bbb F^{n\times m}$. Let $\operatorname{neighborhood}(x)$ denote the elements surrounding $x$ ($x$ included). Let $a,b,c\in A$, $k\in \Bbb F$. I've come across the following relation: $$a\mathcal R_kb \iff a^2+\sum_ {c \in\operatorname…
YoTengoUnLCD
  • 13,384
1
vote
1 answer

Symmetric and transitive but not reflexive

I am trying to do an exercise in Munkres' Topology where I am supposed to show the mistake in the following proof about equivalence relations: Since C is symmetric, aCb implies bCa. Since C is transitive, aCb and bCa imply aCa. This has been asked…
Avatrin
  • 1,527
1
vote
1 answer

Write down all of the elements of $S_6 \times S_6$ which are related to $u = (6, 5)$ under $R'$

Let $S_6 = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}$ and define a relation $R \subseteq S_6 \times S_6$ by $$R = \{(n, m) \text{ | } n < m\text{ or }n = m + 1\}.$$ Question: Write down all of the elements of $S_6 \times S_6$ which are related to $u = (6, 5)$ under $R′$,…
1
vote
2 answers

What is a usual order relation?

I've just started learning about relations and now I'm at partial order relations and total order relations; essentially, I'm trying to convey that I'm very much a beginner to this relations stuff. My textbook includes the following remark: The…
1
vote
1 answer

set-theory (anti-symmetric)

in relation, anti-symmetric -> if xRy and yRx, then x=y. Today, my lecturer said that relation $<$, which represents $(\le \bigwedge\ne)$, satisfies anti-symmetric. He did not prove it and He left it for us to exercise. I have no idea why…
user1292919
  • 1,895
1
vote
3 answers

Is the relation $x \geq 2y$ transitive?

I am trying to understand if the relation $x \geq 2y$ is transitive. I think the answer is no for the following reasons. Can someone please let me know if I am correct or incorrect. If incorrect, why am I incorrect. Definition of transitive: If…
Willard
  • 159