Questions tagged [significant-figures]

This tag contains various questions relating to the "significant figures" or "significant digits" etc. etc. Significant figures or significant digits are the digits which give us useful information about the accuracy of a measurement.

The term significant figures refers to the number of important single digits ($0$ through $9$ inclusive) in the coefficient of an expression in scientific notation .

The number of significant figures in an expression indicates the confidence or precision with which an engineer or scientist states a quantity.

  • The first significant figure of a number is the first digit which is not zero. Hence the first significant figure of $20,499$ is $2$ and the first significant figure of $0.0020499$ is $2$.

  • The second significant figure of a number is the digit after the first significant figure. This is true even if the digit is zero. Hence the second significant figure of $20,499$ is $0$, as is the second significant figure of $0.0020499$.

  • The third significant figure of a number is the digit after the second significant figure. This is true even if the digit is zero, and so on. Hence the third significant figure of $20,499$ is $4$ and the fourth is $9$, as are the third and fourth significant figures of $0.0020499$.

We round a number to three significant figures in the same way that we would round to three decimal places. We count from the first non-zero digit for three digits. We then round the last digit. We fill in any remaining places to the right of the decimal point with zeros. This is because we need them to hold the correct place value for the significant digits.

For example, $20,499$ to three significant figures is $20,500$. We round up because the first figure we cut off is $9$. $\quad 0.0020499$ to three significant figures is $0.00205$. We do not put any extra zeros in to the right after the decimal point. This is because we do not need them to hold the correct place value for the significant digits.

If the last significant digit of a number is $0$, we include this. For example, $0.0020499$ to two significant figures is $0.0020$. The first significant digit is $2$, the second significant digit is $0$. The next digit is $4$, so we round down.

In any calculation, the number of significant figures in the solution must be equal to, or less than, the number of significant figures in the least precise expression or element.

Consider the following product:

$$2.56 \times 10^{67} \times (-8.33) \times 10^{-54}$$

To obtain the product of these two numbers, the coefficients are multiplied, and the powers of $10$ are added. This produces the following result:

$$2.56 \times (-8.33) \times 10^{{67}+(-54)}$$ $$= 2.56 \times (-8.33) \times 10^{67-54}$$ $$= -21.3248 \times 10^{13}$$

The proper form of common scientific notation requires that the absolute value of the coefficient be larger than $1$ and less than $10$. Thus, the coefficient in the above expression should be divided by $10$ and the power of $10$ increased by one, giving:

$$-2.13248 \times 10^{14}$$

Because both multiplicands in the original product are specified to only three significant figures, a scientist or engineer will round off the final expression to three significant figures as well, yielding:

$$-2.13 \times 10^{14}$$

as the product.

Reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significant_figures

85 questions
1
vote
2 answers

Significant figures: a problem.

After going all through web and posts I can't get a complete idea of significant figures. I'll try to explain the problem. The definition that seems more frequent is: significant figures: number of figures carrying on precision. It is easy to see…
user436603
1
vote
1 answer

When adding with differences in significant figures, should you round first?

When adding with differences in significant figures, should you round first? For example, $3.4698 + 2.11 = 5.57$ according to the rules shown in Wikipedia. But in reality, it is closer to $5.58$, as $3.4698$ can be rounded to $3.47$. So which is…
Brendan
  • 131
1
vote
1 answer

significant figures while multiplying measurements with just a number

I am confused with the multiplication rules when it comes to multiply a decimal number with a number like 2. For example, if I want to calculate tidal force between the earth and the moon, I have a bunch of decimal numbers measured before such as…
mrq
  • 113
0
votes
1 answer

Why does 0.00 have zero significant figures and why throw out the implied precision?

Per the accepted answer here: How many significant figures in 0.0 Supposedly, a value like 0.00 has no significant figures. However the implication of that measurement is that the true value could actually be something like .0005, we just can't…
0
votes
3 answers

Most Significant Digit but without Calculator

Consider set $S = \{2^0, 2^1, 2^2, 2^3, 2^4, 2^5, \dots, 2^{2003}, 2^{2004}\}$ and $\log2 = 0.3010$. Find the number of elements in the set $S$ whose most significant digit is 4. It is also known that the most significant digit of $2^{2004}$ is 1…
0
votes
2 answers

Significant figures - division and exact numbers

Say we divide 1858.54 cm by 5 -- where 5 is an exact number. We get the quotient 371.708 According to the rules of significant figures, we would answer write 371.708 cm, since "1858.54" is 6 significant figures, and 5, being an exact number doesn't…
0
votes
1 answer

Question about significant figure problems

Question 1 If I complete the multiplication in each parentheses, I get $4440+308$ which is $4748$. Why does my answer have 4 sigfigs but the answer has 3? Question 2 I got $12.9$ amu instead. Here's my work (significant digits are underlined):
0
votes
1 answer

Significant Figure Rules for Measured Bases and Exponents

The following link How to determine significant figures involving radicals and exponents mentions that if you have 5.1^4 "The 4 is (probably) exact, so we ignore that for deciding precision, so the answer should have two significant digits, just as…
0
votes
1 answer

Is 30 a 2 sf number or a 1 sf number?

Something about significant figures really confuses me, for instance: If we are counting, say, apples and we say there are 30 apples, there are exactly 30, should 30 be a 2 significant figures number or a 1 significant figure. And If I am in a…
Manar
  • 371
0
votes
1 answer

about decimal places

Suppose that $\tilde x$ is an approximation to x. Given that a necessary and sufficient condition for $n$ correct decimal places in $\tilde x$ is $|x − \tilde x| < 0.5 \times 10^{−n}$, so, how to derive a sufficient condition for $n$ correct…
0
votes
2 answers

Why are there only 2 significant figures in the answer?

In the problem $\frac{8.01-7.50}{3.002}$ Why would the answer be $0.17$ and not $0.170$? My least amount of sig figs is $3$ in the original equation. The only thing I can come up with is in the intermediate step.$8.01-7.50= 0.51$ exactly, which…
kbeach
  • 1
0
votes
1 answer

What would I round this answer to for significant figures?

25-6.1=18.9 It's subtraction, so I round to the least number of decimal places. But will my final answer be 18 or 19?
Dylan
  • 73
0
votes
2 answers

Exactly what does the decimal point in the following number mean?

Exactly what does the decimal point in the following number mean? $$2. \cdot 10^{11}$$ It's not followed by any digits. Has it something to do with significant figures? My guess is it has exactly one significat figure i.e $2$. The dot means the…
user635640
0
votes
1 answer

Uncertainty in Measurement and significnt figures in physics

(a)Find $\sqrt{8}$ to four significant figures; then cube this number and round to three significant figures. (b) Find $\sqrt{8}$ to three significant figures; then cube this number and round to three significant figures. (c)Which answer is more…
1
2