Questions tagged [transcendental-numbers]

Transcendental numbers are numbers that cannot be the root of a nonzero polynomial with rational coefficients (i.e., not an algebraic number). Examples of such numbers are $\pi$ and $e$.

Let $\mathbb{A}\subset \mathbb{C}$ be the set of algebraic numbers: $$ \mathbb{A} = \{ z\in \mathbb{C}: p(z)=0, p(z)\in \mathbb{Z}[x] \} $$The set of transcendental numbers is $\mathbb{A}^c$. The first construction of a transcendental number, $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} 10^{-n!}$, was due to Liouville in 1851.

If we fix a degree of polynomials in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$, there are only countably many such polynomials, each with finitely many roots. Then $\mathbb{A}$ is countable, whence $\mathbb{A}^c$ is uncountable. Put crudely, 'most' complex numbers are transcendental, though showing a particular number is transcendental is usually rather difficult.

All transcendental numbers have an irrationality measure of at least 2; see for more information.

818 questions
1
vote
0 answers

Does successive application of $\sin$ function on some nonzero algebraic number ever yields a sequence of transcendental numbers?

On the Wikipedia page about Transcendental numbers there is a section about numbers that are proven to be transcendental and there you can read that transcendental numbers are sin(a), cos(a) and tan(a), and their multiplicative inverses csc(a),…
Farewell
  • 5,008
1
vote
2 answers

Convert PI to base 4. Does my unique human genome exist in the sequence of digits?

The human genome consists of sequences of BASE Pairs A G C T Convert the number PI to base 4. Does my unique human genome exist in the sequence of digits?
1
vote
2 answers

Rationality or irrationality of $\log$ function

Can this be proved that $\log(n)$ is irrational for every $n=1,2,3,\dots$ ? I find that question in my mind in searching for if $\log(x)$ is irrational for every rational number $x\gt0$.
DEEP
  • 516
0
votes
1 answer

Algebraic independence

Let $a_1,\dots,a_n$ be transcendental numbers. If the set $\{a_1,\dots,a_n\}$ is algebraically independent over $\mathbb{Q}$, then so is the set $\{a_1,\dots,a_n,1\}$?
user46234
0
votes
1 answer

algebraic dependence over Q

Are numbers $\sqrt{2}$ and $e$ algebraically dependent over $\mathbb{Q}$? If yes, they belong to the same Mahler class. However, $\sqrt{2}$ is A-number, while $e$ is S-number. On the other hand, if we consider non-zero polynomial $P(x,y) = x^2y -…
0
votes
0 answers

transcendental numbers as solutions to hyperpowers

By the Gelfond-Schneider theorem, if $x^x=2$, $x$ must be transcendental. What can be said of $x$ if $x^{x^x}=2$, $x^{x^{x^x}}=2$ etc.? Must it be transcendental? Of course, $2$ can be replaced by any algebraic number. Henry Harry Lande M Sc
0
votes
1 answer

Show that if $z\in \mathbb{C}$ is a non-rational solution to $\sqrt{3}(1+z)=\tan\left(z\pi/2\right)$, then $z$ is transcendental.

This is exercise 1 from chapter 3 of Pillars of Transcendental Number Theory (Natarajan, Thangadurai), which is on the Gelfond-Schneider Theorem. There are a few clear ways to use the Gelfond-Schneider Theorem; if I can write $z=\alpha^{\beta}$ with…
Ajsc
  • 31
  • 3
0
votes
1 answer

Is $e^a$ always algebraic for transcendental $a$?

From Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem, it is known that $e^a$ for non-zero algebraic $a$ is always transcendental. But if $a$ is transcendental, is the opposite ($e^a \in \mathbb A$) always true?
DozenDucc
  • 139
0
votes
1 answer

Question regarding the proof of $\pi$ is transcendental.

I was reading a proof of the fact that $\pi$ is transcendental over $\mathbb{Q}$, and the author mentioned that if $\pi$ is algebraic then so is $i \pi$, but I'm not particular sure why. Can anybody explain this to me? Thank you.
S10000
  • 369
  • 2
  • 5
0
votes
1 answer

Transcendental number definition query

The wiki page says that a transcendental number is defined as "a number that is not the root of a non-zero polynomial with rational coefficients". When they provide this definition, shouldn't they add that the polynomial order has to be finite…
0
votes
1 answer

Why are Algebraic Equations (i.e. relation between variable and 0) special?

I'm reading the book, "Annotated Turing" in trying to understand what computation really means. It has a section about algebraic equations and trancendental numbers. I'm quiet not understanding why they are special.
csp2018
  • 401
0
votes
2 answers

$e$ in Roth's Theorem

THEOREM 1.8 of the book Making Transcendence Transparent by Burger says: then it says: But $e$ is not algebraic how it satisfies Roth's Theorem ?
user200918
0
votes
1 answer

Importance of the Transcendence of $\pi$ and $e$

Why do people care that $\pi$ and $e$ are transcendental?
user109871
  • 1,447
0
votes
1 answer

Gelfond-Schneider transcendental Kuzmin

The so-called Gelfond-Schneider constant $2^\sqrt{2}$ is transcendental, as shown by Kuzmin (1930). What can you say about its square root? Is it also transcendental?
soc
  • 41
0
votes
1 answer

I'm looking for a definitive ordered list of transcendental numbers

For example, I know that e, pi, sin (1), Louville's constant etc are just four of the many transcendental numbers, but definitively are any of these the "first", "second" and so on transcendental numbers? I'm looking for the first 10 transcendental…