How to prove that $f:(0,\infty )\to\mathbb R$ defined by $f(x)=x^{(x^x)}$ is strictly increasing without calculating the derivative?
-
1@gebruiker : The function probably isn't meant to be defined at $x=0$. Please avoid changing the semantics of a question when editing it. – xavierm02 Nov 03 '14 at 12:27
-
1Is that $(x^x)^x$ or $x^{(x^x)}$? What is the convention here? – Zubin Mukerjee Nov 03 '14 at 12:35
-
@xavierm02 You are right. My appologies. – gebruiker Nov 03 '14 at 12:49
-
Zubin Mukerjee: It's $x^{(x^x)}$. – idm Nov 03 '14 at 12:58
-
5@ZubinMukerjee $x^{y^z}$ is always $x^{\left(y^z\right)}$ because $\left(x^y\right)^z$ can be written as $x^{yz}$. – xavierm02 Nov 03 '14 at 15:14
2 Answers
Let $0<x<1<y<z$. Then $$ x^{x^x} < x^0 = 1 = y^0 < y^{y^y} < z^{y^y} < z^{z^z} $$ so $f(x)$ is monotonically increasing in $[1,\infty)$.
Since $f(x)$ is continuously differentiable in $(0,1)$, either it is monotonic in the interval or there exist $w,x\in (0,1)$ with $w<x$ and $f(w)=f(x)$. Suppose such a choice exists and let $$ a = \frac{\log w}{\log x} > 1, \quad w = x^a \\ w^{w^w} = x^{x^x} \\ ax^{ax^a} \log x = x^x \log x \\ \log a + ax^a\log x = x\log x \\ \log a = x \log x (1-ax^{a-1}) $$ Since $x>0$ and $\log x < 0 < \log a$ we must have $$ ax^{a-1}>1 \\ (1-a) \log x < \log a \\ (1-a) \log x < x(1-ax^{a-1}) \log x \\ a-1 < x(ax^{a-1}-1) $$ then either $ax^{a-1}-1<0$ or $x(ax^{a-1}-1)<ax^{a-1}-1<a-1$, either way leading to a contradiction. Hence there can be no such choice of $w,x$. Thus $f(x)$ must be monotonic in $(0,1)$, and it's simple to check that the direction is increasing in $x$.
- 10,948
- 1
- 26
- 54
You want to prove that $\forall\,x_{1},x_{2}\in\mathbb{R},x_{1}<x_{2}\Rightarrow f(x_{1})<f(x_{2})$. For the sake of simplicity let me investigate only the case $1<x_{1}<x_{2}$. We then have $$x_{1}^{x_{1}}<x_{2}^{x_{1}}<x_{2}^{x_{2}}$$ and finally $$x_{1}^{x_{1}^{x_{1}}}<x_{1}^{x_{2}^{x_{2}}}<x_{2}^{x_{2}^{x_{2}}}$$ You can discuss the other possibilities applying appropriate exponentiation properties.
- 499
-
Of course that for $x\geq 1$ it's obvious !! But the problem is for $0<x<1$ !!! – idm Nov 03 '14 at 21:30