0

Is my proof below original?

We prove Fermat's little theorem in the reduced formulation: If $p$ is an odd prime and $a$ is an integer such that $p < a$ and $p \nmid a,$ then $a^{p-1} \equiv 1\ (mod\ p).$

Note, since $p$ is an odd prime, that the congruence $$a^{p-1} \equiv 1\ (mod\ p)$$ is equivalent to the congruence $$(a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} - 1)(a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} + 1) \equiv 0\ \ (mod\ p).$$ If $$p \nmid (a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} - 1)\ \ \ and\ \ \ p \nmid (a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} + 1),$$ then there exist integers $q, r, q', r' > 0$ such that \begin{eqnarray*} a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} &=& pq + r + 1,\ \ 1 \leq r \leq p-1,\\ a^{\frac{p-1}{2}} &=& pq' + r' - 1,\ \ 1 \leq r' \leq p-1, \end{eqnarray*} so that $$p(q' - q) = r - r' + 2,$$ whence $$p \mid (r - r' + 2),$$ and we have $$r - r' \geq p - 2.$$ So, since $1 \leq r, r' \leq p-1,$ certainly $$r - r' = p-2.$$ With no loss of generality, put $$r := p-1,\ \ r' := 1.$$ But then $$p \mid a^{\frac{p-1}{2}};$$ a contradiction.

Yes
  • 20,719
  • I think you need to give more context to your question. One of my questions on this site was "have you found this result proved this way" - a well known result with many proofs. Or are you talking about a new result? – Mark Bennet Nov 08 '14 at 08:35
  • @MarkBennet: Thanks. But I am after a general method to check the originality of a new proof of a well-known result. It was my fault to choose a wrong tag. – Yes Nov 08 '14 at 08:37
  • A new proof of a known result or a proof of a new result? – Mark Bennet Nov 08 '14 at 08:37
  • well-known result – Yes Nov 08 '14 at 08:39
  • It is possible to find new proofs for well-known results (even for good ol' Pathagoras). Browsing the internet is however a very incomplete method to compare against other proofs, unless you encounter a note specifically investigating the history of proofs of theorem X, say. Why not publish your proof here and see if the community "remembers" it? – Hagen von Eitzen Nov 08 '14 at 08:46
  • @HagenvonEitzen Please see the revision. – Yes Nov 08 '14 at 09:03
  • @MarkBennet: Please see the revision. – Yes Nov 08 '14 at 09:03
  • Ideas? Original? – Yes Nov 08 '14 at 09:10
  • 1
    Why is $r-r'\ge p-2$? Why is $q=q'$, $r=r'-2$ excluded? – Hagen von Eitzen Nov 08 '14 at 09:38
  • @HagenvonEitzen: So is it an unfixable flaw? Thanks. – Yes Nov 08 '14 at 10:28

0 Answers0