I think the empty set satisfies all of the axioms of a vector space except the one about the existence of an additive identity. Is this right?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.2k times
12
-
Wikipedia's definition and axioms suggest you need to specify a field so that you have a scalar multiplicative identity. – Henry Jan 22 '15 at 20:06
-
3If the question is whether $(E,+,\cdot)$ can be a vector space if $E=\varnothing$, then I think the question answers itself: the additive identity is missing, so the answer is no. – David K Jan 22 '15 at 20:12
2 Answers
16
The empty set is empty (no elements), hence it fails to have the zero vector as an element.
Since it fails to contain zero vector, it cannot be a vector space.
amWhy
- 209,954
10
No! If $(E,+,\cdot)$ is a vector space then $(E,+)$ is an abelian group so it contains a neutral element which is the zero vector hence $E\ne\varnothing$.
-
1
-
1It's obvious that the empty set doesn't contain a zero vector since it doesn't contain any element but my answer explains why the empty set isn't a vector space. – Jan 22 '15 at 20:16
-
That's also what I said in the question, that since the empty set doesn't contain a 0 vector then it isn't a vector space; Thanks anyway, I like your answer since it's technical. – user209799 Jan 22 '15 at 20:17
-
1@user209799 Perhaps people are confused because you did not actually write "and therefore it is not a vector space" at the end of your first sentence, although evidently that's what you were thinking. Sometimes it's worth stating the obvious. – David K Jan 22 '15 at 20:19