I am learning proofs with $\mathbb N $. I don't have significant problems using the axioms to prove propositions, I have a problem understanding certain axioms and the definition of >.
1) If $m,n \in\mathbb N$, then $m + n \in\mathbb N$
2) If $m,n \in\mathbb N$, then $mn \in\mathbb N$
3) $0 \notin\mathbb N$
4) For every $m \in\mathbb Z$, we have $m \in\mathbb N$ or $m = 0$ or $-m \in\mathbb N$
I don't understand why 3) is "obvious" since we're defining a new subset ($\mathbb N$). I mean, why couldn't we assume $0 \in\mathbb N$?
Moreover, > is then defined as: Let $m,n \in\mathbb Z$, $m > n$ means $m - n \in\mathbb N$. Again, I am confused. Why couldn't we say m > n means $m - n \notin\mathbb N$? I am sorry if the questions are very "basic" but since I am learning proofs, I am introduced concepts progressively, and I am confused. I am also sorry if the question tag is not appropriate. Please let me know which one is better. Thank you!