If there is a continuous function from the closed unit disk to itself such that it is identity map on boundary, must it be onto?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,675 times
6
-
Homeomorphisms are always surjective. You mean just a continuous map? – Qiaochu Yuan Mar 02 '15 at 06:00
-
Sorry I have revised it. – David Mar 02 '15 at 06:02
-
1"hjhjhj57" thank you! – David Mar 02 '15 at 06:29
-
David, you can tag users using "@"! This way they'll get a notification. – hjhjhj57 Mar 02 '15 at 06:48
1 Answers
9
Yes.
Suppose $f: D^2 \to D^2$ did not have $p \in D^2$ in the image, and such that $f$ restricts to the identity on the boundary. One may pick a homeomorphism $g: D^2 \to D^2$ that restricts to the identity on the boundary, with $g(p) = 0$, so $gf: D^2 \to D^2$ misses $0$.
Now compose with the map $D^2 \to S^1, x \mapsto x/\|x\|$. This defines a retraction $D^2 \to S^1$. But that's silly, as if there were such a retraction, the map $\pi_1(S^1) \to \pi_1(D^2)$ induced by the inclusion would be an injection, and it's not.
-
Thank you. Also, "I'm wondering if there exists a fixed point in the D's interior" – David Mar 02 '15 at 06:57
-
@David I think there should be, but I don't have a proof in mind yet. You should post this as a separate question. – Mar 02 '15 at 07:07
-
-
1@David: The new question is fundamentally a different question than the first one. Generally, if you have multiple (but only a little related) questions, you should post them each separately. I'm suggesting you post this one as a new question. – Mar 02 '15 at 07:12
-
1Ok!thanks for your suggestion and I'm wondering how to construct the function g in your proof. – David Mar 02 '15 at 07:15
-
1Pick a self-homeomorphism $g'$ of the unit disc that takes $p$ to $0$. (You can do this very explicitly; here are the ones you want.) On the boundary, say $g'$ restricts to $h$; extend $h^{-1}$ to an automorphism of the unit disc using the Alexander trick. Call this, uh, $h'$? Then $h'g'$ is the desired homeomorphism. – Mar 02 '15 at 07:42
-
-
If you want to do this in any dimension, it's a bit harder, because you can't resort to picking an easy self-homeomorphism like up there. But it's still true; one can prove it with some smooth manifold theory. – Mar 02 '15 at 08:06