I'm trying to prove the following theorem:
Suppose x is a real number. Prove that if x $\neq$ 1 then there is a real number y such that $\frac{y + 1}{y - 2}$ = x.
The logical structure of the sentence is:
x $\neq$ 1 $\implies$ $\exists$y($\frac{y + 1}{y - 2}$ = x)
I first suppose x $\neq$ 1 so my goal becomes $\exists$y($\frac{y + 1}{y - 2}$ = x).
How to Prove it: A Structured Approach says the following regarding goals with existential quantifiers:
To prove a goal of the form $\exists$x P(x): Try to find a value of x for which you think P(x) will be true. Then start your proof with “Let x = (the value you decided on)” and proceed to prove P(x) for this value of x.
Let's say I chose y = 5. I can therefore let y = 5, conclude that $\frac{y + 1}{y - 2}$ = 2, and since my hypotheses say x $\neq$ 1 and 2 $\neq$ 1 finish my proof.
However this looks like I'm proving a theorem about a certain value of x instead or proving the theorem for all values of x except for 1. I feel I'm proving the following instead:
"Prove that if x = 2 then there is a real number y such that $\frac{y + 1}{y - 2}$ = x"
How should I deal with goals with existential quantifiers instead, to make sure I prove all the cases?