Most papers seem to use sections (e.g. 3) and sub-sections (e.g. 3.1). Is there a published standard that says what sort of thing warrants its own section and what sort of thing warrants its own sub-section?
Asked
Active
Viewed 46 times
2
-
1@Surb I'll edit the question – Hal Apr 01 '15 at 16:02
-
Read other papers and see what they do. Then do it in a way that seems natural to you. – GEdgar Apr 01 '15 at 16:07
-
Actually each journal has its own separate standard. Some use section numbers and some just have section titles without numbers. ${}\qquad{}$ – Michael Hardy Apr 01 '15 at 16:12
-
@MichaelHardy I didn't mean to ask about the numbering, but rather how mathematicians section their papers – Hal Apr 01 '15 at 17:42
-
@GEdgar That's actually why I'm asking. I've only ever sectioned one paper (for class, not published) in a way that I've been happy with, and that seemed to be an accident. – Hal Apr 01 '15 at 17:43
-
How it's done? Just common sense, I think. ${}\qquad{}$ – Michael Hardy Apr 01 '15 at 21:44