A monotone function never has saddle points, same is true for an invertible function. Can we conclude that monotonic function is also invertible and vice-versa?
Asked
Active
Viewed 6,588 times
3
-
It might be a good idea to add a couple of details to your question: From context (including MPW's answer) it seem you're asking about real-valued functions of one real variable. Are you also assuming the domain is an interval? If not, then no, invertibility does not imply monotonicity. – Andrew D. Hwang Apr 03 '15 at 11:57
-
@user86418 domain being an interval is not enough unless you also assume continuity – Mirko Apr 03 '15 at 11:59
-
yes, domain is interval and function is continuous. Would it then be vice-versa? – kaka Apr 03 '15 at 11:59
-
use the intermediate value theorem – Mirko Apr 03 '15 at 12:07
1 Answers
7
Your statement
A monotone function never has saddle points
is false. The function $f:\mathbb R\to \mathbb R$ with $f(x)=x^3$ is (strictly) monotone, has a saddle point at $x=0$, and is invertible with inverse $f^{-1}(y)= y^{1/3}$.
Still, a strictly monotone function $g:\mathbb R\to \mathbb R$ is invertible with its inverse defined everywhere on $g(\mathbb R)$.
Strict monotonicity is required for invertibility. Nondecreasing step functions show why.
MPW
- 43,638
-
2$f$ is invertible when restricted to any subset of its domain. The point is that is it is false to say that monotone functions cannot have saddle points. They can. – MPW Apr 03 '15 at 11:53
-
-
2
-
-
1
-
@Mirko Yes, I was implicitly speaking about functions $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$. – 5xum Apr 03 '15 at 12:15
-
Note that a monotone function $\mathbb R\to \mathbb R$ needn't be increasing or decreasing. Continuity is required to force that. Monotonicity of $f:X\to Y$ just means that $f^{-1}(y)$ is connected for each point $y\in Y$. – MPW Apr 03 '15 at 12:24
-
1Note also that monotone and monotonically increasing (or monotonically decreasing) don't mean the same thing. That's a technical distinction, and I realize that sometimes people say "monotone" when they mean "monotonically increasing". Perhaps that's what OP really meant. – MPW Apr 03 '15 at 12:35