Unfortunately, this problem has an ambiguity in it; it is not clear whether it was intentional or not. The mention of the "smooth spherical object" would seem to be the problem-poser's way of indicating that air resistance may be neglected. Under that assumption (and the "flat ground" assumption), the range of the projectile would be given by $ \ R \ = \ u·T \ , $ with $ \ T \ $ being the time from launch to impact. With the information given and the formula you have for the time the projectile will take to fall, we can calculate
$$ T \ = \ \sqrt{\frac{2·H}{g}} \ \approx \ 2.42 \ \text{seconds and} \ \ R \ \approx \ 54.9 \ \text{meters .} $$
The difficulty arises with the second projectile: if it is to attain the same horizontal range in exactly the same amount of time, then (in the absence of air resistance) it only needs to have the same horizontal speed as the first one. The horizontal component of the launch velocity is $ \ v_h \ = \ v \cos (A) \ \ , $ so we have
$$ R \ = \ u·T \ = \ v \cos (A) · T \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \ v \cos(A) \ = \ 22.68 \ \text{m/sec} \ \ .$$
Since there is no further specification for either the launch speed or angle, there is not a unique solution to this problem.
[I was amused by the stipulation of a "smooth spherical object". Smooth spheres have notoriously poor flight characteristics because of turbulent flow around them. This is why firearms and artillery switched from musket- and cannon-balls to bullets and shells and why golfballs have (carefully designed) dimples.]