6

Show that a rectangular prism (box) of given volume has minimum surface area if the box is a cube.

Could you give me some hints what we are supposed to do??

$$$$

EDIT:

Having found that for $z=\frac{V}{xy}$ the function $A_{\star}(x, y)=A(x, y, \frac{V}{xy})$ has its minimum at $(\sqrt[3]{V}, \sqrt[3]{V})$, how do we conclude that the box is a cube??

We have that $x=y$. Shouldn't we have $x=y=z$ to have a cube??

Mary Star
  • 13,956
  • 1
    Are you familiar with derivatives? – graydad May 14 '15 at 21:07
  • 1
    Yes. I don't know which function gives the surface area... @graydad – Mary Star May 14 '15 at 21:08
  • I mean.... think about it. You have to add up the area of all six sides of this box. Let's say your box has width $W$, height $H$ and length $L$ – graydad May 14 '15 at 21:09
  • Two sides have the area: $W \cdot H$ $$$$ Two sides have the area: $W \cdot L$ $$$$ Two sides have the area: $H \cdot L$ $$$$ Is this correct?? So, the total surface area is equal to $$WH+2WL+2HL$$ , right?? @graydad – Mary Star May 14 '15 at 21:15
  • You are correct! Except it should be $2WH$ but I imagine that was a typo. You will need this formula, as well as the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism – graydad May 14 '15 at 21:16
  • Yes, it was a typo... The formula for the volume of a rectangular prism is $WHL$, right?? @graydad – Mary Star May 14 '15 at 21:19
  • Correct again. I will post an answer with a little more guidance, unless someone else does before me. One moment please :) – graydad May 14 '15 at 21:20
  • Ok!! :-) @graydad – Mary Star May 14 '15 at 21:21
  • If $z=\frac{V}{xy}$ and $x = y = \sqrt[3]{V}$, then $z = \frac{V}{(\sqrt[3]V)^2} = \sqrt[3]{V},$ and therefore $x = y = z$. Symmetric results do not have to come from symmetric reasoning. – David K May 23 '15 at 15:21

7 Answers7

8

Hint: Let a box be $x$-by-$y$-by-$z$. Here we assume $x>0$, $y>0$, $z>0$. Then the surface area of the box is $$A=2(xy+xz+yz)$$ and the volume $V=xyz$ is fixed. We need to find the minimum of $A(x,y,z)$ given additional condition $V=xyz$. But $z=\frac{V}{xy}$ and, hence, $A$ can be considered as a function in two variables $x$ and $y$: $$A_\star(x,y)=2\left(xy+\frac{(x+y)V}{xy}\right).$$ You need to find the minimum of $A_\star(x,y)$.

So let $$ \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial A_\star}{\partial x} = 0,\\ \frac{\partial A_\star}{\partial y} =0; \end{array} \right. $$ and so on ... The minimum will be at $x=y=\sqrt[3]{V}$.

Update:

$$ \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial A_\star}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left( 2xy +\frac{2V}{x}+\frac{2V}{y}\right)=2y-\frac{2V}{x^2}= \frac{2x^2y-2V}{x^2}=0,\\ \frac{\partial A_\star}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left( 2xy +\frac{2V}{x}+\frac{2V}{y}\right)=2x-\frac{2V}{y^2}= \frac{2xy^2-2V}{y^2}=0. \end{array} \right. $$ Since $x > 0$ and $y > 0$ we obtain $$ \left\{ \begin{array}{l} x^2y-V=0,\\ xy^2-V=0; \end{array} \right. \qquad\text{or}\qquad \left\{ \begin{array}{l} x=\sqrt[3]{V},\\ y=\sqrt[3]{V}; \end{array} \right. $$ Now we'll proof that $(x_0,y_0)=(\sqrt[3]{V},\sqrt[3]{V})$ is the minimum of $A_\star(x,y)$. Consider $$ \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial^2 A_\star}{\partial x^2} & \frac{\partial^2 A_\star}{\partial x \partial y} \\ \frac{\partial^2 A_\star}{\partial x \partial y} & \frac{\partial^2 A_\star}{\partial y^2} \end{bmatrix}_{(x_0,y_0)} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{4V}{x^3} & 2 \\ 2 & \frac{4V}{y^3} \end{bmatrix}_{(x_0,y_0)} = \begin{bmatrix} 4 & 2 \\ 2 & 4 \end{bmatrix} $$ We have the minimum if the matrix above is positively defined. Or, in other words, using Sylvester's criterion we should obtain $$ \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \left.\frac{\partial A_\star^2}{\partial x^2}\right|_{(x_0,y_0)} >0,\\ \left.\frac{\partial A_\star^2}{\partial x^2}\right|_{(x_0,y_0)} \left.\frac{\partial A_\star^2}{\partial y^2}\right|_{(x_0,y_0)}- \left( \left.\frac{\partial A_\star^2} {\partial x \partial y}\right|_{(x_0,y_0)} \right)^2 >0. \end{array} \right. $$ Obviously, it is the case. So, $(x_0,y_0)=(\sqrt[3]{V},\sqrt[3]{V})$ is the minimum. Finally, $z_0=\frac{V}{x_0y_0}=\sqrt[3]{V}$. Hence, $x_0=y_0=z_0=\sqrt[3]{V}$ gives the minimum of the area. Consequently, the box should be a cube.

user35603
  • 3,002
  • Having found that for $z=\frac{V}{xy}$ the function $A_{\star}(x, y)=A(x, y, \frac{V}{xy})$ has its minimum at $(\sqrt[3]{V}, \sqrt[3]{V})$, how do we conclude that the box is a cube??

    We have that $x=y$. Shouldn't we have $x=y=z$ to have a cube??

    – Mary Star May 22 '15 at 01:57
  • 2
    If you substitute $x=\sqrt[3]V$ and $y=\sqrt[3]V$ into $z=\frac V {xy}$ you get $z=\frac V {\sqrt[3]V \sqrt[3]V}= \sqrt[3]V$ – tomi May 22 '15 at 08:12
7

Using the method of Lagrange Multipliers, we wish to minimize $$f(x,y,z)=2(xy+xz+yz)$$ subject to the constraint that $$g(x,y,z)=xyz=V$$ for some constant $V$. Differentiating and introducing our Lagrange Multiplier $\lambda$, $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\lambda \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}$$ $$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\lambda \frac{\partial g}{\partial y} $$ $$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}=\lambda \frac{\partial g}{\partial z} $$ we find that $$2(y+z)=\lambda yz$$ $$2(x+z)=\lambda xz$$ $$2(x+y)=\lambda yx$$ and that therefore $$\frac{x+y}{xy}=\frac{x+z}{xz}=\frac{y+z}{yz}$$ From which we can quickly discover that $x=y=z$. Beating the dead horse, we plug back into our constraint equation to find that $x=y=z=\sqrt[3]{V}$, as expected.

Archaick
  • 2,273
2

we will keep the volume at $1.$ let the base have length $x$ and width $y.$ then the volume constraint makes the height of the box $\frac1{xy}.$ you need to minimize the surface area $$A = 2\left(xy+\frac 1x + \frac 1y\right), x > 0, y > 0 $$ now you can use the am-gm inequality $\frac{a+b+c}3\ge (abc)^{1/3}$ to show that $$A \ge 6\left(xy\frac1x \frac 1y\right)^{1/3} = 6.$$ therefore the minimum surface area of the box is $ 6$ subject to the constraint that the volume is $1.$

if you scale everything, you will get $$A \ge 6V^{2/3}. $$

abel
  • 29,170
2

Suppose box $B$ with sides $\ell$, $w$, and $h$ has volume $V=\ell wh$, and suppose that $\ell\ne w$. Consider box $B'$, whose sides are $\sqrt{\ell w}$, $\sqrt{\ell w}$, and $h$, which has the same volume.

Box $B$ has surface area $2(\ell w+wh + h\ell)=2\ell w+2h(w+\ell)$, and box $B'$ has surface area $2(\ell w+2h\sqrt{\ell w})=2\ell w+4h\sqrt{\ell w}$. By the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, $w+\ell\ge 2\sqrt{\ell w}$, and therefore the surface area of $B'$ is smaller.

This observation shows that if a box of volume $V$ has two unequal sides, it does not have the smallest surface area among all boxes of volume $V$. Taking the contrapositive of this implication, If box $B$ does have the smallest surface area of all boxes with volume $B$, then it does not have two unequal sides.

Therefore the box of volume $V$ with the smallest surface area has all sides equal.

Steve Kass
  • 14,881
1

Volume $V=xyz$ given. Area $A(x,y,z)=2(xy+yz+zx)$, to minimise, when $x,y,z>0$ and $xyz=V$.

Fact. If $a,b,c>0$, then $a+b+c\ge 3\sqrt[3]{abc}$, and equality holds if and only if $a=b=c$.

Proof. We set $X=\sqrt[3]{a}$, $Y=\sqrt[3]{b}$ and $Z=\sqrt[3]{c}$. Then the identity $$ X^3+Y^3+Z^3-3XYZ=\frac{1}{2}(X+Y+Z)\big((X-Y)^2+(Y-Z)^2+(Z-X)^2\big),\tag{1} $$ holds. This means that $$ a+b+c-3\sqrt[3]{abc}=X^3+Y^3+Z^3-3XYZ\ge 0, $$ as the right-hand-side of $(1)$ is non-negative, and the equality only if $X-Y=Y-Z=Z-X=0$ or $X=Y=Z=0$ or $a=b=c=0$. $\quad\Box$

Hence, $$ \frac{A}{2}=xy+yz+zx\ge 3\sqrt[3]{xy\cdot yz\cdot zx}=3\sqrt[3]{x^2y^2z^2}=3V^{2/3}. $$ and equality holds iff $xy=zx=yz$ or equivalently iff $x=y=z$.

Indeed, $A$ is minimised when $x=y=z$, and $A_{\mathrm{min}}=6V^{2/3}$.

0

Yes you would have that $x=y=z$, but you have that $V=xyz$ for a rectangular prism, as we have that $x=y=V^{1/3}$ this gives us that $V=V^{2/3}z$ which implies that $z=V^{1/3}$ which means that $x=y=z$

Zelos Malum
  • 6,570
0

What part is not clear? The symmetry automatically pulls you into other two situations cyclically.

Let us take Lagrange Multiplier (as others have also done).

I take the unified Lagrangian combining object and constraint functions of

Volume and Area together.

I also choose it such that in $ V - A \cdot \lambda \tag{1}$ $\lambda$ would be

physically a linear dimension for a side of a rectangular parallelepiped,except

for a constant factor.

$ x y z - ( x y + y z + z x) \lambda \tag{2}$

Partial differentiation with respect to x gives $ y z - ( y+z) \lambda =0,\, \dfrac1y + \dfrac1z= \dfrac{1}{\lambda} \tag{3}$

Remember that when number of independent variables are more than 2, partial differentiation should be done with respect to each variable.

So similarly by cyclic symmetry, $ z x -( z + x)\lambda =0 , \,\dfrac1z + \dfrac1x= \dfrac{1}{\lambda} \tag{4} $

and

$ xy -( x+y)\lambda =0 , \,\dfrac1x + \dfrac1y= \dfrac{1}{\lambda} \tag{5} $

Summming up the three and halving,

$ \dfrac1x + \dfrac1y + \dfrac1z= \dfrac{3}{2\lambda} \tag{6} $

Subtracting from this the second part of $ (3), (4), (5)$ we get

$ \dfrac1x = \dfrac{1}{2 \lambda} \tag{7}, x = 2 \lambda $

that gives you

$ x = y = z = 2 \lambda = a , $ say.

So finally $ V = a^3$ and $ A = 6 a^2.$

Narasimham
  • 40,495