I wanted to check that there was nothing (roughly) wrong with my reasoning in showing that $\mathbb{P}_k^2$ is birational to $\mathbb{P}_k^1 \times \mathbb{P}_k^1$.
First of all, I know that for two irreducible quasi-projective varieities $X$ and $Y$, $X$ is birational to $Y$ if and only if the function fields $k(X) \simeq k(Y)$.
Now, if we consider $\mathbb{P}^2_k \cap U_z \simeq \mathbb{A}^2_k$, then the function field of $\mathbb{P}^2_k$ is that of $\mathbb{A}^2_k$, so is $k(x,y)$.
On the other hand, as a variety, $\mathbb{P}_k^1 \times \mathbb{P}_k^1 \simeq \mathbb{V}(xw-yz) \subset \mathbb{P}_k^3$ (using the Segre morphism). Then taking $\mathbb{V}(xw-yz) \cap $ $ U_w \simeq \mathbb{V}(x-yz) \subset \mathbb{A}^3_k$, we have that $\mathbb{V}(xw-yz) \cap U_w $ $= k[x,y,z]/(x-yz) $ $ \simeq k[y,z]$. So then $k(\mathbb{P}_k^1 \times \mathbb{P}_k^1) = k(y,z) \simeq k(\mathbb{P}_k^2)$.
So then $\mathbb{P}_k^2$ is birational to $\mathbb{P}_k^1 \times \mathbb{P}_k^1$.
Does this look essentially right?
I'm guessing if they were isomorphic, then as this implies they would be homeomorphic. So I'm wondering if I can find a closed set in $\mathbb{P}_k^2$ which cannot map to something closed in $\mathbb{P}_k^1\times \mathbb{P}_k^1$.
– Aaron May 21 '15 at 19:54