Given the equality:
$$a_0\,+\,a_1\,x\, +\,a_2\,x^2 \cdots +\,a_{n-1}\,x^{n-1}\,+\,a_n\,x^n
=a_n\,(x-\alpha_1)\,(x-\alpha _2)\,\cdots (x-\alpha_n)$$
resulting from the fundamental theorem of algebra, the expansion of the RHS of the equation will yield,
$$a_n\,x^n\, - a_n\, x^{n-1}\,(\alpha_1\,+\,\alpha_2\,+\cdots\, +\,\alpha_n)+$$
$$+\,a_n\,x^{n-2}\,(\alpha_1\,\alpha_2+\,\alpha_1\,\alpha_3\,+\cdots\, +\,\alpha_1\, \alpha_n\,+\,\alpha_2\,\alpha_3\,+\,\cdots\,+\alpha_{(n-1)}\,\alpha_n)\, +$$
$$-\, a_n\,x^{n-3}\,(\alpha_1\,\alpha_2\,\alpha_3+\,\alpha_1\,\alpha_2\,\alpha_4\,+\cdots\, +\,\alpha_1\,\alpha_2\, \alpha_n\,+\,\alpha_2\,\alpha_3\,\alpha_4+\,\cdots\,+\,\alpha_{(n-2)}\alpha_{(n-1)}\,\alpha_n)\, +$$
$$+\,\cdots\,+$$
$$+\,a_n\,(-1)^n\,\alpha_1\,\alpha_2\,\alpha_3\cdots\alpha_n.$$
And comparing coefficients between the LHS of the initial equation and this expansion, we see that for $x_0$ (constant term):
$a_n\,(-1)^n\,\alpha_1\,\alpha_2\,\alpha_3\cdots\alpha_n =a_0,$
replicating the equality in the penultimate line of the proof in here. And explaining why $a_0=0$ is incompatible with all the roots being $\neq\,0$.
Similarly, for $x^n$,
$a_n = a_n$
And from here we can see that when $x^{n-1}$,
$-\,a_n\,(\alpha_1\,+\,\alpha_2\,+\cdots\, +\,\alpha_n)\,=\,a_{n-1}.$
And when $x^{n-2}$,
$a_n\,(\alpha_1\,\alpha_2+\,\alpha_1\,\alpha_3\,+\cdots\, +\,\alpha_1\, \alpha_n\,+\,\alpha_2\,\alpha_3\,+\,\cdots\,+\alpha_{(n-1)}\,\alpha_n) = a_{n-2}...$
Perhaps more interesting is the link between this derivation, and the parallel application to the alternative expression of the fundamental theorem of algebra in here:
$$a_0 + a_1x+a_2x^2 + ... + a_nx^n$$
$$\,= a_0\left(1-\frac{x}{\alpha_1}\right)\left(1-\frac{x}{\alpha_2}\right)...\left(1-\frac{x}{\alpha_n}\right)$$
Analogously, the expansion of the RHS of the equation would lead to $a_0 \cdot1^n$ in the constant component of the expansion, while for the coefficient of $x^1$ the equivalent on the expanded form would include any of the $n$ possible $-\,\frac{x}{\alpha_i}$ times $1^{n-1}$, such that
$a_1 = \,-\,a_0 \left(\frac{1}{\alpha_1}\,+\frac{1}{\alpha_2}\,\cdots+\,\frac{1}{\alpha_n}\right), $ which is the last equation on page 18 of G. Polya's "Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning", setting up the stage to prove Basel's problem.