3

When one presents the Brauer group of a field $F$, it is usually said that the group's elements are "equivalence classes of finite dimensional central simple algberas over $F$ under the Brauer equivalence relation".

Now, in this statement it is implicitly said that this object is indeed a set - but usually no explanation for this statement is given.

Notice that by the Wedderburn-Artin Theorem and the Brauer equivalence, it is enough to show that the object "all division algebras over a field" forms a set. So my question is, is this true for any field and why?

Asaf Karagila
  • 393,674
Mike
  • 996

1 Answers1

9

The algebras in that context are all finite-dimensional vector spaces, so that these vector spaces may be assumed to be in the set $\{K^n : n \in \mathbb{N}\}$. There is only a set of algebra structures on the vector space $K^n$, because it corresponds to a subset of $\hom(K^n \otimes K^n,K^n)$.