You seem to have misunderstood how the Laplacian works in this case. Generally, for functions $g$ defined on open subsets of $\mathbb{C}$, the Laplacian of $g$ is
$$\Delta g = \frac{\partial^2 g}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 g}{\partial y^2}.$$
One can also express the Laplacian in terms of the Wirtinger derivatives
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial z} = \frac{1}{2}\biggl(\frac{\partial}{\partial x} - i \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\biggr) \quad \text{and}\quad \frac{\partial}{\partial \overline{z}} = \frac{1}{2}\biggl(\frac{\partial}{\partial x} + i \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\biggr),$$
namely
$$\Delta = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} = 4 \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\frac{\partial}{\partial \overline{z}}.$$
This representation is particularly useful when holomorphic and antiholomorphic functions occur, for we have $\frac{\partial h}{\partial \overline{z}} \equiv 0$ for holomorphic $h$ and $\frac{\partial a}{\partial z} \equiv 0$ for antiholomorphic $a$.
Since the Wirtinger derivatives satisfy the relation
$$\frac{\partial \overline{g}}{\partial \overline{z}} = \overline{\frac{\partial g}{\partial z}}$$
and those that can be derived from it like
$$\frac{\partial g}{\partial \overline{z}} = \overline{\frac{\partial \overline{g}}{\partial z}},$$
the Laplacian of the square of the modulus of a holomorphic function is easily computed:
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial \overline{z}}\lvert f\rvert^2 = \frac{\partial}{\partial\overline{z}}(f\cdot \overline{f}) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial \overline{z}}\cdot \overline{f} + f\cdot \frac{\partial \overline{f}}{\partial \overline{z}} = 0\cdot \overline{f} + f\cdot \overline{\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}} = f\cdot \overline{f'},$$
and then, since $f'$ is again holomorphic, so $\overline{f'}$ antiholomorphic,
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\frac{\partial}{\partial\overline{z}}\lvert f\rvert^2 = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}(f\cdot \overline{f'}) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\cdot \overline{f'} + f\cdot \frac{\partial \overline{f'}}{\partial z} = f'\cdot \overline{f'} + f\cdot 0 = f'\cdot \overline{f'} = \lvert f'\rvert^2.$$
No second derivative actually occurs, since each factor of $\lvert f\rvert^2 = f\cdot \overline{f}$ is holomorphic or antiholomorphic, so one of the two Wirtinger derivatives annihilates that factor.
For
$$h = \sum_{k = 1}^n \lvert f_k\rvert^2,$$
the constantness of $h$ immediately implies $\Delta h \equiv 0$, so
$$0 \equiv \Delta h = \sum_{k = 1}^n \Delta \lvert f_k\rvert^2 = 4\sum_{k = 1}^n \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\frac{\partial}{\partial\overline{z}} f_k\cdot \overline{f_k} = 4\sum_{k = 1}^n f_k'\cdot \overline{f_k'} = 4\sum_{k = 1}^n \lvert f_k'\rvert^2.$$
Since each term in the sum is non-negative, the sum can only be $0$ if each term is $0$, i.e. $f'_k \equiv 0$ for all $k$.