I would not consider $f(x)=x^{2/3}$ to be concave down on $(-\infty,\infty)$, but rather on $(-\infty, 0)\cup(0,\infty)$. If we use the definition of concave down to be "A function $f$ is concave down when $f'$ is decreasing", then we can see this is not the case with $f(x)=x^{2/3}$. Its derivative, $f'(x)=\frac{2}{3\sqrt[3]{x}}$, is decreasing on its domain, which is $(-\infty, 0)\cup(0,\infty)$. So by that definition, $f(x)$ is not concave down on $(-\infty,\infty)$.
While I agree that $x^{2/3}$ does not have an inflection point at its cusp, that doesn't mean we can't have inflection points at cusps. It really depends on your definition of inflection point. You can easily make these types of cusps appear by taking absolute values of functions. For example: $g(x)=\left| x^2-1\right|$ has cusps at $x=\pm 1$ and also changes concavity there.
