I mean without the i. Re(z) and Im(z) would be real numbers right?
4 Answers
No, but you can write it $z = \operatorname{Re}(z) + i \operatorname{Im}(z)$. (Note that $\operatorname{Im}(z)$ is a real number.)
- 43,639
-
1The map $z=x+iy→x+y$ is not one-to-one. But if you supplement it with a second map $z=x+iy→x-y$ then you can retrieve z from both. However, I see no advantages in proceeding along these lines. – Urgje Nov 11 '15 at 10:40
-
Are the $\Im$ and $\Re$ maps traditionally regarded as $\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}$, or as $\mathbb{C} \to {x+0i| x \in \mathbb{R}}$. If the first, then when we write ${\Re}(z) + i {\Im}(z)$, the concatenation of $\Im(z)$ with $i$ is not really multiplication, right? – Ovi May 07 '19 at 23:05
for $z\in \mathbb{C}$, we can write $z=a+b\mathrm{i}$. In this case $a=\mathrm{Re}(z)$, and $b=\mathrm{Im}(z)$.
- 106
Let a complex number $ z $ be: $ z = a + ib $; then we define $ \text{Re}(z) = a $ and $ \text{Im}(z) = b $. As you see $ \text{Re}(z) $ and $ \text{Im}(z) $ are real numbers and thus the real number $ z_2 = \text{Re}(z) + \text{Im}(z) $ is different from $z$.
- 407
for $z\in \mathbb{C}$, we can write $z=a+b\mathrm{i}$. In this case $a=\mathrm{Re}(z)$, and $b=\mathrm{Im}(z)$.
Re(z) and Im(z) would be real numbers right?
Yes.
$\forall \, z \in \mathbb{C}, \exists! \, (a,b) \in \mathbb{R}^2, z = a + b\imath$
And you have:
Re(z) = a
Im(z) = b
Thus, Re(z) and Im(z) are real numbers.
Can we write a complex number z like this Re(z)+Im(z)?
Yes.
You can write a complex number z such as z = Re(z) + Im(z).
$z = 0$ works, for example.
Let's take $z \in \mathbb{C}, \exists! \, (a,b) \in \mathbb{R}^2, z = a + b\imath$.
$z = Re(z) + Im(z)$
$\Leftrightarrow a + b\imath = Re(z) + Im(z)$
$\Leftrightarrow a + b\imath = a + b$
$\Leftrightarrow b = 0$
Thus, $z = Re(z) + Im(z) \Leftrightarrow z \in \mathbb{R}$. In fact, all the real numbers works.
- 1