1

Show that, if p, q and r are distinct positive numbers, there are exactly four umbilics on the ellipsoid $$\frac{x^2}{p^2}+\frac{y^2}{q^2}+\frac{z^2}{r^2}=1$$ What happens if $p$, $q$ and $r$ are not distinct?

$$$$

To show that I considered the parametrization $\sigma (u,v)=(p\cos u\sin v, q\sin u\sin v, r\cos v)$.

Then the principal curvatures are the roots of $\begin{vmatrix} L-\kappa E & M-\kappa F\\ M-\kappa F & N-\kappa G \end{vmatrix}=0$.

I found the following:

$$\kappa^2 \sin^2 v \\ \left [((p^4+q^4)\sin^2 u\cos^2 u+p^2q^2(\cos^4 u+\sin^4 u))\cos^2 v+r^2\sin^2{v}(p^2\sin^2 u+q^2\cos^2 u)-(q^2-p^2)\sin^2u \cos^2u \cos^2v\right ]-\kappa \frac{pqr\sin^2 v}{\sqrt{\sin^2 v(q^2r^2\cos^2 u+p^2r^2\sin^2 u)+p^2q^2\cos^2 v}} \left [(p^2\cos^2 u+q^2\sin^2 u)(\cos^2 v+1)+r^2\sin^2 v)\right ]+\frac{p^2q^2r^2\sin^2 v}{\sin^2 v(q^2r^2\cos^2 u+p^2r^2\sin^2 u)+p^2q^2\cos^2 v}=0 $$

Can this be correct? Can we simplify it?

$$$$


$$$$

enter image description here

Mary Star
  • 13,956
  • 1
    Can I know the reference ? If $p,\ q,\ r$ are distinct, there exist $4$ umbilics ? – HK Lee Jan 08 '16 at 00:51
  • It is the exericse 8.2.7 (page 196) from the book of Andrew Pressley "Elementary Differential Geometry" [http://dwwebs.com/combinedpdf.pdf ] . @HKLee – Mary Star Jan 08 '16 at 01:00
  • Is what I have done so far correct? @HKLee – Mary Star Jan 08 '16 at 01:39
  • In fact this is an interesting problem to me. (since I did not see this before) In this site someone already asked. I will attach the page. – HK Lee Jan 08 '16 at 01:42
  • http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1022803/umbilical-points-of-ellipsoid-alternate-method?rq=1 In this page, he refered some note in OP. Following the note, we may do long calculations (I did not calculate yet). – HK Lee Jan 08 '16 at 01:45

1 Answers1

2

Consider a parametrization $f$ :

$$ x=a\cos\ t \cos\ s,\ y=b\cos\ t\sin\ s,\ z=c\sin\ t $$ Define $$ A:=\cos\ t,\ B=\sin\ t,\ C=\cos\ s,\ D=\sin\ s $$ Then $$ f_t=(-aBC,-b BD, c A ) ,$$ $$ f_s=(-aAD, b AC, 0 ) $$ $$ f_{tt} =(-aAC,-b AD,-cB) $$ $$ f_{st} = (aB D, -bBC,0) $$ $$ f_{ss} = (-aAC,-bA D,0 ) $$ Hence we have first fundamental forms : $$ E=a^2 B^2 C^2 + b^2 B^2 D^2 + c^2 A^2 $$ $$ F=(a^2-b^2) ABCD $$ $$ G=A^2 ( a^2 D^2 + b^2C^2) $$ so that $$ EG-F^2 = A^2\{ a^2b^2 B^2D^2 + a^2c^2 A^2D^2 + b^2 c^2 A^2 C^2 \} $$

Then unit normal is $$ N = \frac{f_t\times f_s}{|f_t\times f_s|} = (-bcA^2 C, ac A^2 D, -ab AB ) l $$ where $$ l= \frac{1}{ |A| \sqrt{ (bc AC)^2 + (ac AD)^2 + (abB)^2 } } $$ And second fundamental forms are $$ e= (N,f_{tt})= abc\ A\{ A^2 C^2 - A^2 D^2 +B^2 \} l $$ $$ f=(N, f_{st})= -2abc\ A^2BCD l $$ $$ g= (N, f_{ss})= abc \ A^3(C^2-D^2) l $$

Then

$$ \frac{ eg-f^2 }{(abcA^2l)^2} = A^2 ( C^2-D^2)^2 + 4 B^2C^2D^2 + B^2 (C^2-D^2) :=m $$

And $$ \frac{1}{2} \frac{gE -fF+ eG }{abc\ A^3l} = \frac{1}{2} \{ ( a^2 D^2 + b^2C^2) \{ A^2 C^2 - A^2 D^2 +B^2 \} $$ $$+2(a^2-b^2) (BCD)^2 +( a^2 B^2 C^2 + b^2 B^2 D^2 + c^2 A^2) (C^2-D^2) \} $$

$$ =\frac{1}{2}\bigg[ a^2 \{ C^2 D^2 - A^2D^4+B^2C^4 + B^2D^2 \} $$ $$+ b^2 \{ -C^2D^2 + A^2C^4 + B^2C^2-B^2 D^4 \} + c^2A^2 (C^2-D^2) \bigg] :=n$$

By $H^2=K$, we have $$ \bigg( \frac{n \ abc\ A^3l}{EG-F^2 } \bigg)^2 = \frac{m\ (abc\ A^2l)^2}{EG-F^2} \Rightarrow n^2A^2 =m(EG-F^2) $$

$$\frac{1}{A^2} m(EG-F^2) -n^2$$

$$= ( a^2b^2 B^2D^2 + a^2c^2 A^2D^2 + b^2 c^2 A^2 C^2 )( A^2 (C^2-D^2)^2 + 4 B^2C^2D^2 + B^2(C^2-D^2) )$$ $$ - \frac{1}{4} ( a^2 ( C^2 D^2 -A^2D^4+B^2C^4 + B^2D^2 ) $$ $$+ b^2 ( -C^2D^2 +A^2C^4 + B^2C^2-B^2 D^4 )+c^2A^2 (C^2-D^2) )^2 $$

$a=b,\ C=0,\ D=1$ Case : We will consider $z\geq 0$ Then $(0,0,c)$ is umbilic. Assume that $0< A\leq 1$ Then $$\frac{1}{A^2} m(EG-F^2) -n^2 = -\frac{1}{4} \{ a^2(-3A^2+2) + A^2c^2 \}^2$$

Hence $$ c= \frac{a\sqrt{3A^2-2}}{A} $$

HK Lee
  • 19,964
  • I got stuck at the point where you calculate $$\frac{ eg-f^2 }{(abcA^2l)^2} = A^2 ( C^2-D^2)^2 + 4 B^2C^2D^2 + B^2 (C^2-D^2) :=m$$ Could you explain to me why calculate this? – Mary Star Jan 15 '16 at 21:54
  • 1
    We must find Gaussian curvature K – HK Lee Jan 16 '16 at 02:40
  • So do we use the Gaussian curvature to find the number of the umbilics? I haven't really understood how... Could you explain it to me? – Mary Star Jan 16 '16 at 03:32
  • 1
    Umbilics implies that square of mean curvature is equal to K – HK Lee Jan 16 '16 at 03:34
  • We have that the mean curvature is $H=\frac{1}{2}(\kappa_1+\kappa_2)$ and the Gaussian curvature is $K=\kappa_1\kappa_2$. Umbilics means that $\kappa_1=\kappa_2$, so $H^2=K$. Is this correct? So do we have to find all the points $(x,y,z)$ that satisfy the condition $H^2=K$ ? – Mary Star Jan 16 '16 at 10:49
  • 1
    Yes it is correct – HK Lee Jan 16 '16 at 11:01
  • Ah ok... I added at my initial post the formulation of an other exericise... Could we use also these formulas to calculate $H$ and $K$ and find the umbilics? – Mary Star Jan 16 '16 at 11:33
  • Or is the way with the parametrization better? – Mary Star Jan 16 '16 at 11:35
  • 1
    I did not calculate wrt your posting but f is given by root so that for f_xx we must differentiate twice (Still it may be long computation) but it may be easy Try it – HK Lee Jan 16 '16 at 11:39
  • Ok... I will try it... Is $f$ as follows $$z=f(x,y)=r \sqrt{ 1-\frac{x^2}{p^2}-\frac{y^2}{q^2}}$$ ? – Mary Star Jan 16 '16 at 11:42
  • Yes it is right – HK Lee Jan 16 '16 at 12:17