Is it correct to say:
If a set $A$ has a point $x$ such that for all $r>0$, the open ball of radius $r$, centered at $x$ is not a subset of $A$, then $A$ must be a closed set.
Is it correct to say:
If a set $A$ has a point $x$ such that for all $r>0$, the open ball of radius $r$, centered at $x$ is not a subset of $A$, then $A$ must be a closed set.
As has been said in the comments, your formulation is not quite correct.
Here is something that you can say:
$A$ is closed iff, for each $x \not \in A$, there is a $r > 0$ so that $B_r(x)$ does not intersect $A$.
Hint for proof: Try to show that $A^c$ is open. Show that the complement of an open set is closed. (And conversely, the complement of an open set is closed.)
Further relevant exercises, related to the comments: 1) Show that $\mathbb{R}$ and $\emptyset$ are both both open and closed in $\mathbb{R}$. Generalize this to a general metric space. 2) Find a metric space in which every subset is both closed and open. 3) Describe the open and closed sets in $\mathbb{Q}$ 4) Describe the closed and open sets in the Cantor set.
Interesting. So in real analysis, "not open" is not the same as "closed"? I thought 'open' and 'closed' were negations of each other :(
Does this mean that there can be a set that is not open nor closed?
– amazonprime Jan 26 '16 at 04:39Hmm. Good thing I didn't end up relying on this in my homework. Thank you for the info!
– amazonprime Jan 26 '16 at 04:43