From the basic definition of convergence, with $\varepsilon$'s:
Fix $\varepsilon > 0$. By definition, there exists $a \geq 0$ such that, for all $ x\geq a$, $L-\varepsilon \leq f^\prime(x) \leq L+\varepsilon$.
For $x\geq a$, write
$$
f(x) - f(a) = \int_a^x f^\prime
$$
which gives
$$
(L-\varepsilon)(x-a) \leq f(x) - f(a) \leq (L+\varepsilon)(x-a)
$$
or, equivalently,
$$
(L-\varepsilon)\left(1-\frac{a}{x}\right) + \frac{f(a)}{x} \leq \frac{f(x)}{x} \leq (L+\varepsilon)\left(1-\frac{a}{x}\right) + \frac{f(a)}{x}.
$$
Since $\frac{a}{x}\xrightarrow[x\to\infty]{} 0$ and $\frac{f(a)}{x}\xrightarrow[x\to\infty]{} 0$, there exists $b\geq 0$ such that, for $x\geq b$ we have $\lvert \frac{f(a)}{x}\rvert, \lvert \frac{a}{x}\rvert \leq \varepsilon$. It follows that for $x\geq \max(a,b)$,
$$
(L-\varepsilon)\left(1-\varepsilon\right) + \varepsilon \leq \frac{f(x)}{x} \leq (L+\varepsilon)\left(1-\varepsilon\right) + \varepsilon.
$$
which implies
$$
L-L\varepsilon \leq \frac{f(x)}{x} \leq L+2\varepsilon.
$$
This is easily seen to be equivalent to showing (e.g., by replacing $\varepsilon$ with $\varepsilon^\prime = \min(\frac{\varepsilon}{2}, \frac{\varepsilon}{L})$ in the beginning), since $\varepsilon$ was arbitrary, that $\frac{f(x)}{x}\xrightarrow[x\to\infty]{} L$.