0

Ok so we are given a Markov chain $X_n$, $P=P(ij)$ as the transition matrix and the $(\pi_1,\pi_2,\pi_3,...,\pi_n)$ as steady-state distribution of the chain. We are asked to prove that for every $i$:

$\sum_{i\neq j} \pi_iPij = \sum_{j\neq i} \pi_jPji$

Can somebody explain me what that means and why it is (obviously true for every steady -state distribution? Plus, how do we prove it??

  • Are you sure the required equation isn't: for each state $i$, that $\sum_{j\neq i} \pi_i P_{ij} = \sum_{j\neq i}\pi_j P_{ji}$? This would be true. – Mick A Feb 05 '16 at 19:56
  • @MickA The writing is a bit sloppy, in that both sums are over $j$ at fixed $i$, but I think we know what is meant. – Ian Feb 05 '16 at 20:19
  • @Ian In that case, it's not the detailed balance equation of reversibility. It's saying the long term rate of entering state $i$ equals the long term rate of leaving state $i$, which I think is true. – Mick A Feb 05 '16 at 20:26
  • @MickA Oh, never mind, yes, I forgot about the sum. You are right, I will remove my previous comments. – Ian Feb 05 '16 at 20:52
  • @Ian No problem. BTW, this is called the Global Balance Equations (still under assumption that the OP intended what is in my first comment). Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_equation#Global_balance – Mick A Feb 05 '16 at 20:56

2 Answers2

1

I think you need the condition that the Markov Chain is reversible.


Def: Let $X$ be an irreducible Markov chain such that $X_n$ has the stationary distribution $\mathbb{\pi}$ for all $n$. The chain is called reversible if the transition matrices of $X$ and its time-reversal $Y$ are the same, which is to say that $$\pi_iPij = \pi_jPji \:\:\:\: \forall i,j$$

Thm: Let $P$ be the transition matrix of an irreducible chain $X$, and suppose that there exists a distribution $\mathbb{\pi}$ such that $$\pi_iPij = \pi_jPji \:\:\:\: \forall i,j$$ Then $\mathbb{\pi}$ is a stationary distribution of the chain. Furthermore, $X$ is reversible in equilibrium.


Suppose that $\mathbb{\pi}$ satisfies these conditions, then

$$\sum_{i} \pi_iPij = \sum_{i} \pi_jPji = \pi_j \sum_{i} Pji = \pi_j $$

JKnecht
  • 6,543
1

The other answer is incorrect in saying that you need detailed balance. Intuitively, the equation in the OP says that the probability going into state $i$ is equal to the probability going out of state $i$, when the distribution is the stationary distribution. But the difference between these two quantities is $(\pi P - \pi)_i$, which is zero by the definition of $\pi$. (In my notation, $P$ is the transition probability matrix and is taken to be row-stochastic, and so $\pi$ is a row vector.)

Ian
  • 101,645