I'm really unsure of how to proceed, I've drawn a picture and can understand the general setting but don't know how to actually prove it.
1 Answers
This is not possible if $f$ is not a bijection. This is because, whatever manifold structure $A$ has, a diffeomorphism is, first and foremost, a bijection.
If $f$ IS a bijection though, first define the topology on $A$ by defining a subset $U\subset A$ to be open $\iff$ $f^{-1}(A)$ is open in $M$. Now $f,f^{-1}$ are inverse homeomorphisms with this new topological structure.
Next, if $(U_\alpha,\phi_\alpha)$ is a cover of $M$ by open sets $U$ and homeomorphisms $\phi_\alpha:U_\alpha\to \tilde U\subset \mathbb R^n$ gives the manifold structure on $M$, then define $(V_\alpha,\psi_\alpha)$ as $V_\alpha = f(U_\alpha)$ and define $\psi_\alpha$ to be $\phi_\alpha\circ f^{-1}$ . The $\psi_\alpha$ are homeomorphisms.
Now I will rest and ask you to work. Prove four things:
- In the second paragraph, prove that $f$ and $f^{-1}$ are homeomorphisms with the topology I just defined on $A$.
- In the third paragraph, prove that the $(V_\alpha,\psi_\alpha)$ are actually valid charts giving $A$ a manifold structure
- Prove that $f$ gives a diffeomorphism with this manifold structure on $A$
- Prove that this is the unique manifold structure that gives a diffeomorphism (First prove that the topology cannot be any different and next prove that the manifold structure cannot either.
Let me know if you have trouble somewhere or need additional help.
- 9,315
-
My bad, the function f should also be onto, hence a bijection. I'll edit the question. – Daniel Ward Mar 06 '16 at 11:29
-
I'm off to bed, but if you need more help others will be around (Use chat, maybe) or i'll be back in say ~12 hrs. – Arkady Mar 06 '16 at 11:43