Square matrices have a diagonal. They also have an anti-diagonal.
There are upper-triangular and lower-triangular matrices. We could easily imagine an "anti-upper-triangular" matrix, such as $\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{matrix}\right]$, which is nonzero above its anti-diagonal. We can also imagine "anti-lower-triangular" matrices, which are nonzero under their anti-diagonal.
We can imagine anti-circulant and anti-Toeplitz matrices, which are constant along the direction of the anti-diagonal rather than along the direction of the diagonal.
So, the question: Is there a symmetry here? Can theorems involving diagonal "stuff" (and there are many of those) generally be transformed into similar theorems involving anti-diagonal stuff? I suspect the answer may be "no", but if so, I'd be interested in knowing why not. Why is the diagonal direction so much more interesting than the anti-diagonal direction?