In one book I came across the notation $A^\dagger := \overline{A}^T$. But how does one usually handwrite it? When I try to do it, it seems so similar to $A^+$
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,656 times
7
-
1It is usually referred to as a "dagger", which is common notation for the "Hermitian Adjoint" of a matrix. Another common notation is $A^*$ – John Martin May 23 '16 at 18:06
-
1The notation $A^+$ often would not have any particular meaning, it thus many not be much of a problem. – quid May 23 '16 at 18:14
-
@quid, some literature use it to denote the Moore-Penrose inverse; one could conceivably see a linear algebra paper where conjugate transposition and taking the pseudoinverse of a matrix are both done. (In that case, I would follow Siddharth's first suggestion.) – J. M. ain't a mathematician May 23 '16 at 18:25
-
@J.M. Yes I agree with both. Maybe let us throw some more stuff in the mix like $ L^T L^\perp T^{\dagger}T^+ $. :-) – quid May 23 '16 at 22:24
2 Answers
5
Lots of people use $A^*$ to represent the Conjugate Transpose.
To actually draw the dagger, draw a really long vertical line, dashed with a small horizontal. I personally dash the horizontal at an angle when I'm doing this so I know that it's a dagger.
I personally use the third style like I mentioned.
Siddharth Bhat
- 8,452
2
Never thought I'd give handwriting advice here, but I suppose this does fall under notation. I agree, the dagger can look like a plus sign. My rendition adds a guard to the dagger's pommel. Additional advantage: it's a single stroke.
zahbaz
- 10,441
-
2This might end up looking like raising to the $p$-th power for the careless. – J. M. ain't a mathematician May 23 '16 at 18:19
-
-
@J.M. Hah, yeah. I swear it's not a p! Nor a $\rho$! Ah, well, it's discernable within the stylesheet of my handwriting. Maybe it can aid another's. – zahbaz May 23 '16 at 18:20
-
(P.S. "phi" $\varphi$ and "rho" $\rho$ are different letters. ;)) – J. M. ain't a mathematician May 23 '16 at 18:23
-
@J.M. I posted prior to seeing Will's response. I wouldn't be caught dead writing a $\phi$ that sloppily. – zahbaz May 23 '16 at 18:24
-
2
-
