I am working on a complex number problem set and I have had success so far except for the following, which makes me think that I am missing something rather simple in the initial steps that would clear everything up for me. I have made attempts in cartesian, polar, and euler form. I have even cheated by assuming that which is to be proven, and haven't found anything convenient pop out that I could then reverse engineer from the beginning. I have googled but haven't come up with a good search term to even help me find anything useful. I have attempted proof by contradiction, although the curriculum this is from does not generally use contradiction proofs so I am expecting another method to be useful. This is for an International Baccalaureate Higher Level Mathematics problem set and the question comes from the Cambridge textbook, chapter 15 if that's relevant to anyone.
Here's the question.
$$w = \frac{k \,z}{z^2 + 1} \quad \text{with} \;\;z^2 \ne -1\,, \;\operatorname{Im}(w) = \operatorname{Im}(k) \ne 0\,, \;\operatorname{Im}(z) \ne 0$$
Prove $|z| = 1$.
Does that clear things up?
– GreaTeacheRopke Jun 05 '16 at 14:45[w = (kz)/(z² + 1)]
and the 3 conditions that: (1) z² is not equal to 1. Without coding I was am not sure how to properly type that. (2) the imaginary part of w = the imaginary part of k, both of them are not equal to 0 (ie both w and k have imaginary components). (3) z also has an imaginary component
– GreaTeacheRopke Jun 05 '16 at 16:37The equation can be rewritten as wz^2 - kz + w = 0. Letting z = a + bi, and this being a quadratic in z, the other root must be a - bi. Now the product of the roots must be w/w = 1 = (a + bi)(a - bi) =a^2 + b^2. But a^2 + b^2 = |z|.
Some issues I have: the answer does not use the fact that Im(w) = Im(k), and also I don't know if the product of roots theorem can be used for a complex polynomial. Any thoughts on this?
– GreaTeacheRopke Jun 09 '16 at 07:52