Suppose we are in an abelian category $\mathscr{A}$. Given a fixed monomorphism $A \overset{i}{\hookrightarrow} B$, and an object $C$, I would like to express concisely the notion of the group of maps $A \to C$ modulo those which extend to $B$. I think it should have a concise expression in the $\operatorname{Ext}$ functor.
Background: For any chain complex $A_\bullet \in \operatorname{Ch}_\bullet(\mathscr{A})$, if we define $H^q(A_\bullet, M) \overset{\text{def}}{=}H^q(\operatorname{Hom}(C_\bullet, M))$, then the Kronecker pairing $$ H^q(A_\bullet, M) \times H_q A_\bullet \to M $$ gives us an adjoint map $$H^q(A_\bullet, M) \xrightarrow{\alpha} \operatorname{Hom}(H_q A_\bullet, M).$$ The Universal Coefficient theorem tells us that if $\mathscr{A}$ is a category of modules over a PID, then $\alpha$ is surjective, with kernel $\operatorname{Ext}^1(H_{q-1}A_\bullet, M)$.
If we just let $\mathscr{A}$ be any abelian category, it seems that $$ \operatorname{Ker}\alpha = \frac{\operatorname{Hom}(A_q/\operatorname{Ker}\partial^q, M)}{q\text{-coboundaries}} $$ which I can see view as maps $\operatorname{Hom}(\operatorname{Img}\partial^q, M)$ modulo those which extend to all of $A_{q-1}$. The maps that extend to all of $A_{q-1}$ are those maps $\operatorname{Img}\partial^q \xrightarrow{f} M$ such that the class of the short exact sequence $\operatorname{Img}\partial^q \hookrightarrow A_{q-1} \twoheadrightarrow A_{q-1}/\operatorname{Img}\partial^q$ goes to zero in the map $$ \operatorname{Ext}(A_{q-1}/\operatorname{Img}\partial^q,\operatorname{Img}\partial^q) \xrightarrow{\operatorname{Ext}(A_{q-1}/\operatorname{Img}\partial^q,f)} \operatorname{Ext}(A_{q-1}/\operatorname{Img}\partial^q, M). $$ So I'm looking for a neater way to express $\operatorname{Ker}\alpha$ in terms of the $\operatorname{Ext}$ functor.