As already said in comments and answers, in the most general case, equations such that $$\alpha\mathrm{e}^{\beta x}+\gamma\mathrm{e}^{\delta x}=\epsilon$$ will not show analytical solutions and numerical methods would be required. The exceptions would correspond to situations where the ratio $\frac \beta \delta$ or $\frac \delta \beta $ would be a small $(<4)$ whole number.
Assuming all constants to be positive, the function $$f(x)=\alpha\mathrm{e}^{\beta x}+\gamma\mathrm{e}^{\delta x}-\epsilon$$ varies very fast and locating the root could be difficult. On the other hand, considering $$g(x)=\log(\alpha\mathrm{e}^{\beta x}+\gamma\mathrm{e}^{\delta x})-\log(\epsilon)$$ could be much more convenient since the plot of the new function will look (more or less) to a straight line.
For illustration purposes, let us consider the case of $$f(x)=123 e^{\pi x}+456 e^{e x}-123456789$$ and
$$g(x)=\log(123 e^{\pi x}+456 e^{ex})-\log(123456789)$$ In both cases, a plot of the function reveals that the solution is close to $x_0=4$. So, let us use Newton method starting at this value.
Using $f(x)$, the iterates will be
$$\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 4.3640459464006870 \\
2 & 4.2648712725384999 \\
3 & 4.2468522386110215 \\
4 & 4.2463481388110046 \\
5 & 4.2463477579278545 \\
6 & 4.2463477579276373
\end{array}
\right)$$
Using $g(x)$, the iterates will be
$$\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 4.2467859955218309 \\
2 & 4.2463477592885205 \\
3 & 4.2463477579276374
\end{array}
\right)$$
Using $g(x)$ with $x_0=0$ gives as a first estimate $x_1=4.367$.