This question is basically a puzzle to be solved with Bayesian statistics. But that might be for some already too much mathematics. Although this is a mathematics site, there may be some people that arrive on this question who can not read equations/math so easily. Therefore I thought that this answer might be helpful.
An extremer case:
The question may become more intuitive when you consider this problem:
- I have 5 coins. One of them is a two-headed coin, and the others are two-tailed coins. I pick a coin, and then I flip that coin three times; each time is heads. What is the probability that the coin is two-headed?
In this case you would not find it strange that the probability changes after observing how the coin is working. But now imagine that the two-tailed coins are false coins that flip 99% of the time on tails, should that change suddenly make such dramatic effect that we can not use experiments to become more certain about whether or not the coin is the double heads one?
Probability as frequency
Imagine you do the experiment many times. Then this is how often you get, on average, the results:
$$\begin{array}{ccll}
\text{unfair coin} & 1/5 & \begin{cases} \text{unfair coin and }\hphantom{\text{not }}\text{3 heads in a row} & \\ \text{unfair coin and }\text{not 3 heads in a row} \end{cases} & \begin{array}{} 1/5 \times 1/1 &=& 2/10 \\ 1/5 \times 0/1 &=& 0/10 \end{array}\\
\text{fair coin} & 4/5 & \begin{cases} \hphantom{\text{un}}\text{fair coin and }\hphantom{\text{not }}\text{3 heads in a row} \\ \hphantom{\text{un}}\text{fair coin and }\text{not 3 heads in a row} \end{cases} & \begin{array}{} 4/5 \times 1/8 &=& 1/10 \\ 4/5 \times 7/8 &=& 7/10 \end{array}\\
\end{array}$$
So you see that observing the 'triple heads' occurs with a higher frequency for the false coin than for the fair coin. So one might put more believe (with probability = 2/3) in the case that one has landed in the situation with the false two-headed coin.
From an alternative viewpoint. For the cases that the coin is unfair, you will be always right. For the cases that the coin is fair, you will be only wrong for 1/8-th of the cases. You could say that the prior probability for drawing an unfair coin remains 1/5, but your response in the individual draws and after observations for specific cases is what differs from the 1/5-th frequency. The unfair coins occur with 1/5-th probability, but you will be able to filter out the unfair coins with 100% certainty and for the fair coins you will make mistakes only 12.5% of the time.
Small sidenote: you mention that this is related to the Monty Hall problem, and it is indeed related to the sticking to the initial selecting probability and rejecting/overlooking conditional probability, but it might be more related to the sleeping beauty paradox instead.