If those are the right number of brackets, and that is the proper subset symbol, then your reasoning is okay. Any set is not a proper subset of itself, and sets do not include redundant copies of their elements. Thus the LHS is equal to the RHS rather than a proper subset.
Of course, its a different matter if $\bbox[cornsilk,2pt]\subset$ is read as the "subset or equal", which some texts do.
Many consider $\bbox[cornsilk,2pt]\subset$ and $\bbox[cornsilk,2pt]\subseteq$ to be analogous to $\bbox[cornsilk,2pt]<$ and $\bbox[cornsilk,2pt]\leq$ , respectively. Others just don't make the distinction, causing much confusion to their poor students.
Some authors try to use $\bbox[cornsilk,2pt]\subsetneq$ for proper subset to be clear what they mean; similar to the rarely used $\bbox[cornsilk,2pt]\lneq$ . However, the tiny strikethrough can be easy to miss if you are not looking out for it.