Similar question: An open interval as a union of closed intervals
My approach to this question feels ham-fisted. I would appreciate,
- Correction if supplied proof is wrong
- Discussion to allieviate ham-fistedness
- Avoidance of the word 'clearly'
To Prove: For every $x$ in an open interval $I$, there exists a closed interval $\bar{I}_{\frac{\delta}{2}}$ strictly contained in $I$, with $x \in \bar{I}_{\frac{\delta}{2}}$.
(Here we consider $(\mathbb{R},|\cdot|)$ where the $|\cdot|$ is the Euclidean metric.)
Definition:
An interval $I\subset \mathbb{R}$ is open iff \begin{align*} \exists \delta >0, \delta \in \mathbb{R}, \text{ such that } (x-\delta,x+\delta) \subset I \quad \forall x \in I \end{align*}
Proof:
Suppose $I$ is open and $I=(a,b)$ with $a<b$, and $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$. Then pick an $x' \in I$. Since $I$ open, $\exists \delta>0$ with $(x'-\delta,x'+\delta)=I_\delta \subset I$.
But then $(x'-\frac{\delta}{2},x'+\frac{\delta}{2})=I_{\frac{\delta}{2}} \subset I_\delta \subset I$, is also an open set.
Claim: $\bar{I}_{\frac{\delta}{2}}=[x'-\frac{\delta}{2},x'+\frac{\delta}{2}]$ is a closed set and strictly contained in $I$.
We prove this by checking that $\bar{I}^c=(-\infty,x'-\frac{\delta}{2})\cup(x'+\frac{\delta}{2},+\infty)$ is an open set.
Suppose $y \in \bar{I}^c$. Then either $y \in (-\infty,x'-\frac{\delta}{2})$ or $y \in(x'+\frac{\delta}{2},+\infty) $. Let $y \in(x'+\frac{\delta}{2},+\infty) $.
Define: $\delta_1< |y-(x'+\frac{\delta}{2})|$.
Then $(x'+\frac{\delta}{2})<y<\delta_1+(x'+\frac{\delta}{2})$ and so $y \in \Big((x'+\frac{\delta}{2}),\delta_1+(x'+\frac{\delta}{2})\Big)\subset \Big((x'+\frac{\delta}{2}),+\infty \Big)$, so $\Big((x'+\frac{\delta}{2}),+\infty \Big)$ is open.
A similar argument holds for $\Big(-\infty,(x'-\frac{\delta}{2})\Big)$. Hence $\bar{I}_{\frac{\delta}{2}}\subset I$ is a closed set. Moreover it is an interval , since the closure of an open interval is again an interval.
:-)) – Brian M. Scott Nov 04 '16 at 19:51