1) Correct. The fact that the derivative at $0$ is undefined doesn't preclude monotonicity. You know that $f(x)=\sqrt[3]{x}$ is strictly increasing on the open intervals $(-\infty, 0)$, $(0, \infty)$, and also know that $f(0) \lt f(x)$ for $\forall x \gt 0$ and $f(0) \gt f(x)$ for $\forall x \lt 0$. This makes $f(x)$ strictly increasing on the whole $\mathbb{R} = (-\infty,\infty)$.
2) Technically correct, but both intervals of monotonicity should include $\{0\}$, as $f(x)$ is strictly increasing on $[0,\infty)$ and strictly decreasing on $(-\infty,0]$. See previous step why.
[
EDIT ] The question was edited since I posted my answer. After the latest edit, my former
1) Correct. would rather now be
1) Technically correct, but.... It
is technically correct that $\sqrt[3]{x}$ is increasing on $(-\infty,0) \cup(0,\infty)$ but that's a weaker statement than $\sqrt[3]{x}$ being increasing on the whole of $\mathbb{R}$. Just like for example saying that $\sqrt[3]{x}$ is increasing on $(1,2) \cup (3,5)$ is technically correct, but is not the best or most relevant assessment of the monotonicity of $\sqrt[3]{x}$.
a function increases or decreases on an interval not at one point. Do you disagree that $2+\sqrt[3]{x^2}$ is strictly increasing on $[0,\infty)$ and *also* strictly decreasing on $(-\infty,0]$? – dxiv Nov 22 '16 at 05:16