1

It's well known that $(0,1)$ is open in $\mathbb{R}$ but is not open in $\mathbb{R}^2$, when we make the 1-1 correspondence between $x\in \mathbb{R}$ and $(x,0) \in \mathbb{R}^2$. (The usual euclidean metric is assumed.) I want to confirm if the following more general statements are true:

1) No (non-empty) open subsets of $\mathbb{R}$ can be open in $\mathbb{R}^2$?
2) Every closed subsets of $\mathbb{R}$ is closed in $\mathbb{R}^2$?

The answer to 2) appeared to be yes from Closed subset of closed subspace is closed in a metric space (X,d).

Now suppose $E\subset Y\subset X$, where $X$ is a metric space. If the above statements are true, to find an $E$ that is closed in $Y$ but not closed in $X$ (i.e. somewhat dual example to $(0,1)$ being open in $\mathbb{R}$ but not in $\mathbb{R}^2$), I suppose I must find a $Y$ that is not closed in $X$. Is the following a valid example?

3) $(0,1]$ is closed in $(0, 2]$ but is not closed in $[-1,2], \mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{R}^2$?

4) Lastly, a statement dual to Closed subset of closed subspace is closed in a metric space (X,d) is also true, right? (i.e. an open subset of an open metric subspace is open in a metric space.)

I'd appreciate a confirmation, refutation or comments.

syeh_106
  • 3,093
  • 1
  • No non-empty subset of R at all whether open or closed or neither can be open in R^2 (assuming you mean the euclidean metric, which you never stated and do need to-- and that you interpret R to be $approx$ to $R \times {0} \subset R^2$ and $A\subset R$ to be $approx$ to $A \times {0}$). 2) No subset of R has limit point that aren't also in R. So yes every closed subset of R is closed in R^2.
  • – fleablood Nov 24 '16 at 08:46
  • 2
    $\mathbb{R} \not\subset \mathbb{R}^2$ – Prince M Nov 24 '16 at 08:52
  • @PrinceM You're right. The wording of the question is sloppy. I'll fix it. – syeh_106 Nov 24 '16 at 09:10
  • No problem! @ syeh_106 – Prince M Nov 24 '16 at 20:50