1

I am sure this is trivial to most, but wanted to confirm that this is how you write the sum for this sequence:

$$a_{11}b_{11}+a_{12}b_{21}+a_{13}b_{31}+a_{14}b_{41}+\cdots+a_{1j}b_{i1}=\sum_{n=1}^j\sum_{m=1}^ia_{1n}b_{m1}$$

Michael Hardy
  • 1
HugHes
  • 13
  • 4
  • 1
    Are $a_{11}b_{21}$ and $a_{12}b_{11}$ terms of the sum? I would usually expect one of these to be listed between $a_{11}b_{11}$ and $a_{12}b_{21}$ in the sum on the left side. My guess is you meant to include these terms but got hasty when writing the sum. But that is only a guess, and I could be wrong. – David K Jan 10 '17 at 19:37
  • 1
    @HugHes Can you please clarify what the LHS means? There is no obvious pattern implied by the $\cdots$: comparing the first two terms suggests that the second and third indices advance together, but the last term doesn't fit the pattern! – Erick Wong Jan 10 '17 at 19:38
  • I added some more terms I hope they clear it up – HugHes Jan 10 '17 at 19:49
  • @HugHes : The problem is that your last term is neither $a_{1j} b_{j1}$ nor $a_{1i} b_{i1}$, but $a_{1j} b_{i1},$ so that the second index on $a$ doesn't match the first index on $b,$ although they match in the first four terms you've written. Consequently it is unclear whether you intended them always to match, or if not, then what you intended instead. $\qquad$ – Michael Hardy Jan 10 '17 at 20:07
  • Yeah I can see the confusion, however the index for a is not supposed to match the index for b, otherwise the sum could be simply written as $$\sum_{n=1}^ia_{1n}b_{n1}$$ or $$\sum_{n=1}^ja_{1n}b_{n1}$$ – HugHes Jan 10 '17 at 20:21

2 Answers2

1

This looks OK to me. I have two suggestions.

First, use $m$ and $n$ for the limits and $i$ and $j$ for the running indices. That's standard usage and will help your readers.

Second, write out each side independently for some small values of $m$ and $n$ and check that you get the same $mn$ terms in each case.

Ethan Bolker
  • 95,224
  • 7
  • 108
  • 199
0

If what you mean is $\sum a_{1n}b_{m1}$ for $1 \le n \le i$ and $1 \le m \le j$, then you are correct.

I think that you would have to show more terms in the sum before I would be confident of this result.

Also, this look like a partial matrix pruduct.

marty cohen
  • 107,799
  • Thanks for the help, the way you have written it is more clear but is more difficult to work with. And you are correct about the partial matrix product. – HugHes Jan 10 '17 at 19:52