I know how to solve if the left side is just lgn, but it has an extra n. Was it correct to multiply both sides by e?
Asked
Active
Viewed 31 times
0
-
1I have honestly never seen "lgn" before. What does it mean? – The Count Jan 30 '17 at 01:47
-
@TheCount Usually, $\operatorname{lg}=\log_2$. – Simply Beautiful Art Jan 30 '17 at 01:48
-
@SimplyBeautifulArt OK, that's what I assumed from the context. Is it more common outside the US? Or is it somewhat esoteric? – The Count Jan 30 '17 at 01:48
-
OK, I don't understand your last step. Care to explain it? – The Count Jan 30 '17 at 01:49
-
There is no solution in elementary functions for a problem such as this. You might want to look at the Lambert W-function – rogerl Jan 30 '17 at 01:50
1 Answers
0
That is not the correct way to do it. Indeed, checking your answer into the original line, it is obvious this is false. Instead, note the Lambert W function:
$$n\ln(n)=\ln(n)e^{\ln(n)}=10^6\ln(2)$$
$$\implies\ln(n)=W_0(10^6\ln(2))$$
$$\large n=e^{W_0(10^6\ln(2))}$$
Simply Beautiful Art
- 74,685
