0

I found this one more challenging, I think the length of it confused me the most.

Given Statement:
$\forall x \in \Bbb N \left[\left(\exists y \in \Bbb N \left(2 \le y \land y \lt x \land y \mid x \right)\right) \to \left(\exists z \in \Bbb N \left(2 \le z \land z \le \sqrt x \land z \mid x\right)\right)\right]$

So far I have written it as:
For all $x$ in the natural numbers and there exists $y$ for all natural numbers where $z$ is smaller or equal to $y$ if and only if $y$ is smaller than $x$ if and only if $y$ is a divisible of $x$ then, $\cdot \cdot \cdot$

I only wrote it up to the $\rightarrow$, but not sure if it makes sense and furthermore if it's correct. Thus, can I continue like this for the next part.

Any edits of my existing statement and any help in converting to plain English is welcomed. Thank you in advance.

1 Answers1

0

Take any natural number $x$. If we can find a natural number $y$ between 2 and $x-1$ (inclusive) such that $y$ divides $x$, then there exists another natural number $z$ between 2 and $\sqrt(x)$ (inclusive) that divides $x$ as well.

wto
  • 398