I've been thinking about a basic question recently. It is well known that the Bernoulli distribution $$p_k = {N \choose k} p^k (1-p)^{N-k} \tag{1} $$ asymptotes
- (i) to a Gaussian distribution if $p=const$ and $N\to\infty$ (also $1\ll k \ll N$) and
- (ii) to a Poisson distribution if $p\to 0$ and $N\to \infty$ precisely such that $pN=\lambda=const$.
One possible proof of $(i)$ makes use of Stirling's approximation to simplify the factorials in the binomial factor. Here, I am more interested in (ii). One way to show (ii) is simply to write out the factorials in the binomial coefficient as products, cancel factors and then use the well-known formula $(1+x/N)^N\to e^x$ as $N\to \infty$. I understand that derivation.
Nonetheless, as in both (i) and (ii) $N\to \infty$, it seems tempting to use Stirling's approximation again, but somehow when I try to do so, I do not manage to get Poisson's distribution back out. Here's what I tried:
Use Stirling's approximation in the form $n! \sim n^ne^{-n}$ (where $A \sim B$ means "$A$ asymptotic to $B$") such that $\frac{N!}{(N-k)!}\sim \frac{N^N}{(N-k)^{N-k}} e^{-k}$. Then
$$p_k \sim \frac{N^N}{(N-k)^{N-k}} e^{-k} \frac{\lambda^k}{N^k} \frac{\left(1-\frac{\lambda}{N}\right)^{N-k}}{k!}$$ Next, simply rearrange and use $(1-k/N)^N \sim e^{-k}$ to find
$$ p_k \sim \left(1-\frac{k}{N}\right)^k \left(1-\frac{\lambda}{N}\right)^{N-k} \frac{\lambda^k}{k!} $$
Now, comparing to the Poisson distribution, I would expect that the first two terms are asymptotic to $e^{-\lambda}$. However, if I plug in large numbers for $N$ and $k$, this is not the case. What is the problem?