-2

Prove the following:

If we take $n$ when $N$ is natural number bigger than one, then:

For any value for $n$, there are $k$ number which causes the following equation to be true $$n^2-k^2=p\times q$$ where $k$ is a natural number, $p$ and $q$ are prime numbers

small
  • 29
  • I'm sorry the order of the lines looked bad – small Jul 05 '17 at 18:47
  • 3
    It is incredibly difficult to read due to the many typos and grammatical errors. Are you asking for a proof of the claim "For any natural number $n>1$ there exists a natural number $k$ such that $n^2-k^2$ is the product of two primes"? This isn't true for $n=2$, nor is it true for $n=3$. – JMoravitz Jul 05 '17 at 18:51
  • 1
    Note that $n^{2} - k^{2} = (n + k)(n - k)$. Are you asserting: "If $n \geq 2$ is an integer, there exists an integer $k$ with $1 < k < n - 1$ such that $p = n + k$ and $q = n - k$ are prime"? – Andrew D. Hwang Jul 05 '17 at 18:51
  • 1
    I've attempted to clear up the spelling and grammar issues, I hope I haven't changed the meaning of the question in any way – lioness99a Jul 05 '17 at 18:53
  • (have rolled back the edit after mine to preserve the OPs original language. New edit made lots of changes to notation I am not sure the OP would have used/understood) – lioness99a Jul 05 '17 at 18:56
  • Sorry @lioness99a, I was editing while you already had edited, therefore when I submitted my edit, your edit was gone and mine was applied. – Jaideep Khare Jul 05 '17 at 18:57
  • @JaideepKhare That's OK, but in future try not to add complex notation (like $\mathbb N$ and $\exists$) when the OP hasn't used it, otherwise it can make them seem more knowledgable about the topic than they are – lioness99a Jul 05 '17 at 18:58
  • @wojowu n=prime k=0 – small Jul 05 '17 at 19:26
  • @jmoravitz yes as you said and if n=2 k=0 you can see another Example for n=62 n^2=3844 we can see if k=39 n^2-k^2=2323=101×23 – small Jul 05 '17 at 19:28
  • @Andrew D.Hwang yes as you said but k maybe =0 – small Jul 05 '17 at 19:33
  • @lioness99a i am sorry but i am from russia i thank you for you edit i thanl you again – small Jul 05 '17 at 19:35

2 Answers2

1

Not a solution but a reformulation of the problem.

Your conjecture is actually a weaker form of the famous unsolved Goldbach conjecture. When you state $n^2-k^2=(n-k)(n+k)=pq$ with primes $p$ and $q$, then this means

$$n-k=p,n+k=q\qquad\text{or}\qquad n-k=1,n+k=pq.$$

In the former case this means that $n$ is the average of the two prime numbers $p$ and $q$:

$$\frac{p+q}2=\frac{(n-k)+(n+k)}2=\frac{2n}2=n$$

or that $2n$ is the sum $p+q$. This is exactly the statement of the Goldbach conjecture. However, your conjecture contains the other case $k=n-1$, thus $n+k=2n-1=pq$.

Your weaker version is

Conjecture. Any even number is either the sum of two primes or one more than the product of two primes. Formally, for all $n$ there are primes $p,q$ so that $$2n=p+q\qquad\text{or}\qquad 2n=pq+1.$$

Even though it is weaker, it might be still a very hard problem.

M. Winter
  • 29,928
0

Since $n^2-k^2=(n+k)(n-k)$, a possible solution is $p+q=2n$. If the Goldbach conjecture is true, then this is true for $n>1$ because it (the Goldbach conjecture) states that such $p$ and $q$ exist (which is very likely). But it is not necessary. It is also possible that $n+k=pq$ and $n-k=1$ so $2n=pq+1$ (again for $n>1$). So heuristically this is very likely anyway. It states simply that if $M$ is a counterexample to the Goldbach conjecture, then $M-1$ is the product of 2 primes. That should make it pretty clear that it basically hinges on how good the Goldbach conjecture is, because not many odd numbers are the product of two primes. That is, unless there is some deep relation between the two possibilities.

another suggestion: Note that $n=\frac{p+q}{2}$ or $n=\frac{pq+1}{2}$ , so $p$ and $q$ could be either even-even or odd-odd pairs. But there is only one even prime. Hence $n^2-k^2$ is odd so if $n$ is even $k$ must be odd and if $n$ is odd $k$ must be even.

EDIT: That was actually a useless suggestion considering that the relation between $p$,$q$ and $n$ must stand regardless of the nature of $k$. In other words if we find conditions on $k$, it doesn't add any extra information to the solutions for $p,q$

jg mr chapb
  • 1,502
  • 1
  • 13
  • 44