How to verify the theorem in case of a hyperbolic circle radius $r$ for constant negative Gauss curvature $ K=-1/a^2 $ and constant geodesic curvature $k_g $ ... e.g., like here...
$$k_g=1/r \tag1 $$
$$ \int k_g ds + \int\int K dA = 2 \pi \tag2 $$
(Geodesic polar coordinates) Perimeter and Area plugged in from :
$$ Perimeter = 2 \pi a \sinh (r/a) ,\, Area= 4 \pi a^2 \sinh^2(r/2a) \tag3 $$
as these reduce to $ ( 2\pi r, \pi r^2) $ when $ a\rightarrow \infty$
$$\frac{\pi a \sinh (r/a) }{ r } -{ 4 K \pi a^2 \sinh^2 (r/2a)} = 2 \pi $$
does not tally in general. Also when $ r\rightarrow 0, \pi + \pi (r/a)^2 \ne 2 \pi$
Clearly (1) is assumed intentionally wrong, but then what is correct ? It needs to be defined properly in the tangent plane or in the hyperbolic plane which is not known to me.
Since a direct calculation (like for case $ K=+1/a^2 $) appears elusive.. an indirect back -calculation is the only resort . For this case we have after some simplification:
$$ \boxed{a \, k_g= \coth (r/a ), R_g=a \tanh (r/a)}\tag4$$
verified by plugging this into GB thm (1). When
$$r\rightarrow \infty,\,k_g \rightarrow \,(1/a),\, R_g \rightarrow \,a \tag5 $$
$$r=0 ,k_{g} = \infty \tag6 $$
as expected for a point circle.
(4) is a new result (for me) surprising and apparently anomalous because it is bounded. There is no way to check it directly or conceptually reinforcing it by other theorems or better known results in hyperbolic geometry.
And that is the motivation of this posting...
Show how theses hyperbolic circles are/can be placed geometrically in the hyperbolic models available (Poincaré half plane, Poincaré disc and Klein's )
